[ad_1]
Attempts to restore world power in Iran’s nuclear deal warned of complications on the path to the agreement as they met for the first time after the election as Iran’s president Ibrahim Raisi, A hardline conservative clergyman, hates the West.
US National Security Adviser Jack Sullivan said that the arrow points in the right direction, but he declined to say whether the Trump administration’s sanctions on Lacey will be lifted. The German government’s human rights commissioner, Bärbel Kofler, said that Reich’s failure to clearly distance himself from human rights violations is worrying. At the same time, a European diplomat warned that the negotiations could not be open-ended, and strongly hinted that they needed to reach an agreement before Lai Xi came to power in early August.
Israel, which did not participate in the talks, led the opposition, condemning the incoming government as a “cruel executioner regime”, referring to Raisi’s involvement. Mass execution In 1988, it was predicted that it would become the pawn in the hands of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.
“Raisi’s election is, I would say, before returning to the nuclear agreement, the world power has the last chance to wake up and understand the people they are doing business with,” Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett said. “The brutal executioner regime must not be allowed to possess weapons of mass destruction. Israel’s position will not change.”
Senior diplomats from China, Germany, the United Kingdom, France and Russia will return to the capital for consultations after meeting in Vienna to assess the progress of the 2015 agreement.The United States withdrew under Trump’s leadership, but Biden’s White House said it would rejoin according to the terms, which roughly means that it will reduce sanctions if Iran It will resume its original commitment on uranium enrichment and other issues, which has been violated.
Iranian diplomats, including Foreign Minister Javad Zarif, insisted that they have the same negotiating authority as before and said they can reach an agreement before Raisi takes power in early August, because the remaining obstacles are not insurmountable. . Raisy himself stated during the campaign that he supports the deal.
Sullivan downplayed the importance of Lai Xi to the Vienna talks. “The final decision on whether to re-sign the agreement lies with the top leader of Iran. He is the same person before and after the election,” he told ABC News.
Some Western diplomats have claimed that Iran has stalled during months of negotiations to ensure that the outgoing reformist government cannot resume transactions and lift US sanctions before the election. These diplomats claimed that with the reformists now defeated in Iran, an agreement to resume the deal could be reached quickly.
But others claim that the same difficult issues remain unresolved, including how the United States will guarantee that it will not withdraw from the agreement again, how Iran will deal with the knowledge and assets it has developed in violation of the terms of the agreement, and how long the tough Iranian parliament can legally maintain and delay Iran Comply with the terms of the agreement until it is satisfied with the lifting of US sanctions and the exact basket of US sanctions that will eventually be lifted. The United States lifted some sanctions on Friday, allowing humanitarian food and medicine to enter the country.
The Iranian conservatives further called the initial nuclear agreement “a stinky corpse” and “national shame”, so they will have to perform a subtle political rotation to claim that restarting the agreement is a political victory.
Trump took the US out of the deal in 2018, imposing maximum economic sanctions on Iran, politically torpedoing the reformist government led by Hassan Rouhani, in part creating the context for Raisi to win the election.
The 60-year-old head of the judiciary, Lai Xi, won an overwhelming victory with 18 million votes in a fierce competition where rivals were prevented from standing, but his task was weakened due to the decline in the number of votes. The true turnout rate may be closer to 43%, rather than the official 48%, which is already the lowest record in the history of the Islamic Republic.
The ballots cast included 4 million corrupted ballots, which was far higher than the normal ratio. This shows that a large number of Iranians have consciously decided to go to the polling station to register their protest against the regime, as well as the limited options on the ballot-which makes Iran The proportion of people who voted for candidates rose by up to five percentage points.
The turnout rate in the capital Tehran was only 26%, while the turnout rate in Shiraz was slightly higher than 30%. In Tehran Province, 12% of the votes were invalid. In comparison, the national turnout rate in 2017 was 73.3%, and in 2013 it was 72.9%.
As a result, the reformists conducted a fierce investigation on the wisdom of some people such as Behzad Nabavi on social media. In the absence of a real reformist candidate, they focused on the central bank governor Abdolnasser Hemmati. He ended up in fourth place, behind the spoiled votes and another conservative.
Some older generations supported Hemmati at the last minute, and the reformist umbrella group had a 50/50 disagreement over whether to support a person with little extensive political experience, because his tenure at the central bank was unpopular and Surprisingly, there is no clear economic plan. This is the most likely issue that the election will turn to. When the reformists semi-recognized him, the poll showed that Hemarty had no chance of winning, which was 3.6% in the poll.
Many people say that the defeat with Hemati marks the death knell of a certain generation of reformers. They believe that a democratically elected government can achieve change without facing the powerful conservative non-elected country led by Khamenei.
The United States claimed that Iranians were denied democratic elections and pointed out that all well-known reformers were disqualified from candidates by 12 guardianship committees.
Zarif said that he was disappointed and surprised at the disqualification, but accepted the legitimacy of Lai Xi as president, which shows the limitations of some reformers.
As an opponent of the anti-corruption movement, Lacey’s task is to formulate an economic plan, a cabinet, including a new foreign minister and head of the judiciary, and to mitigate the threat of another wave of coronavirus that has swept the country.
His election was frustrating for human rights activists. The head of Amnesty International, Agnès Callamard, called for the prosecution of Raisy because he killed thousands of MEK detainees in 1988. Iran believed that MEK was a terrorist organization trying to overthrow the regime, but the main figures of the regime privately condemned extrajudicial executions at the time. Raisi was a member of the death committee, which sent thousands of people to be shot or hanged.
[ad_2]
Source link
