The three goddesses of Liverpool must be ashamed of their crudeness ||||||||| Rowan Moore

widthUNESCO decided last week Deprived of Liverpool’s World Heritage statusIts actions are widely regarded as a conflict between the remote bureaucracy and the city’s heroic efforts to revitalize the subsequent industrial zone. “Liverpool’s waterfront flourished without the support of UNESCO and will do so again,” the organization wrote. Liverpool EchoSports director David Prentice (David Prentice) spoke for many people.

In fact, a proposed new stadium Everton It is the catalyst of UNESCO’s anger, and provides power for this narrative. On the one hand, the people’s game — or what Everton likes to call his “people’s club” — on the other hand, anonymous officials meeting in distant countries. To be precise, in Fuzhou, China, the 44th session of the World Heritage Committee decided the fate of the city by secret ballot. “UNESCO is geographically and spiritually out of touch with Merseyside,” Prentice wrote.

But this is a tragedy and it can be avoided. A city seems to be at war with its heritage, and protection and restoration should be placed on the opposite side.Citizen of Liverpool Should be on the same side with UNESCO, because they should all care about the identity and history of the city. They have the same enemy: Over the years, the city’s government and private real estate companies have been shoddy and contemptuous of World Heritage Sites. The latter now has greater freedom, can do whatever he wants, and has the most reason to be happy with the decision last week.

Designated by UNESCO, it is called a maritime commercial city and includes six areas in the center of Liverpool and the waterfront. The first focus of its attention is the Liverpool waters, a large-scale development project of the Peel Group, which owns most of the old docklands along the Mersey River. Located north of the Three Goddesses, this magnificent early 20th-century commercial building is one of the city’s largest architectural stars and is close to the powerful Stanley Wharf tobacco warehouse in 1901. In 2012, Peel’s ambitious plan received planning permission to emulate Shanghai’s skyscraper clusters, despite fears that they would overwhelm historic neighbors. It is replaced by a less dramatic, but still intrusive and uninspired development.

Then came Plans to build a stadium for Everton, This club has gone through a long and frustrating process of finding a new home, which will also be built on property owned by Peel. This requires filling in the Bramley-Moore terminal that is included in the secondary list. England has a long history against it, among other things, because it is more likely to lose its status as a World Heritage Site. Despite this, the community secretary Robert Jenric passed the project.

In fact, England with a long history has a difficult argument. Its main objection is the loss of water caused by filling the pier instead of anything built. This place in Liverpool has a lot of water, and losing some of it doesn’t seem to be terrible. The common-sense view is that if there is a clear public interest in doing so, if there is no viable alternative, and if it is not a precedent to fill most other piers, it may be built on some old piers. The problem is: this view needs to be supported by a credible, coherent and balanced overall regional plan.

If these sounds like vague wishes, you can see them in action in Hamburg, a large old port city like Liverpool in some respects. here, Port City Development Combine heritage with regeneration and public interests, such as well-preserved open spaces and private profits from offices and apartments. And they are there, built and used, unlike many parts of Peel’s Shanghai fantasy that have not yet been realized.

To achieve such an achievement in the current former World Heritage Site requires thoughtful and effective management, and this is a quality that is hard to find in modern Liverpool. Instead, the former mayor Joe Anderson is happy to show his indifference to the UNESCO designation- “Certificate on the Wall”, He called it-and enthusiastically supported the radical Liverpool Waters design.The former city administration was scattered with potential idols, a bulky ferry terminal and the heavier Liverpool Museum in the land around the Three Goddesses, and “Black Coffin”, As they call it, it constitutes a comprehensive development project on the Isle of Man.

Most of the damage that UNESCO fears has not yet occurred. It seems to have reacted more to planning decisions already made and signs of lack of respect or seriousness from the government. This is a national and city-wide issue: by definition, World Heritage Sites receive national and international attention. The failure of Liverpool also belonged to Jenric and the Minister of Culture, Oliver Dawden, They seem to have taken little or no measures to avoid the loss of status.

Anderson has now resigned. He was arrested on suspicion of conspiracy to commit bribery and witness intimidation in December last year. The city’s redevelopment director Nick Kavanagh was fired in March last year and was previously arrested twice on suspicion of conspiracy to commit fraud and bribery. Kavanagh denied these allegations. Anderson also insisted that these allegations were baseless and said he was suing Merseyside police for wrongful arrest.June, Jenric Appointment of Commissionero Oversee the improvement of Liverpool City Council in the next three years. The new mayor, Joanne Anderson (Joanne Anderson) has nothing to do with her predecessor, and she has a chance to start again. In terms of heritage, her problem is that her job has become more difficult due to her loss of UNESCO status.

Source link

Recommended For You

About the Author: News Center