[ad_1]
People who face huge costs in high-rise residential buildings to repair fire safety deficiencies criticized the government’s plan to help them sue developers to recover costs.
Tenants with combustible cladding and other fire safety issues said that the British Housing Minister confirmed the plan on Sunday. Robert Jenric, Provide very little help because they cannot afford to instruct the lawyers and face immediate payment requirements.
This measure will allow residents to file a lawsuit within 15 years from the date of construction of the building, which means that in principle, people living in a house built in 2006 can file a lawsuit this year, but due to the 15-year limit, it cannot be later. It will be included in the Post-Grenfell Building Safety Bill to be submitted to Parliament on Monday.Although the government has repeatedly refused to legislate to protect tenants from costs Conservative back seat rebellion.
Jenric said that the new regulations give tenants a longer time to sue, and are designed to “give residents greater powers to seek compensation from the developer, and the developer’s work simply does not meet the standard.” Currently, homeowners have only six years to take legal action. Janrik claimed that this change will “decisively make the balance beneficial to consumers… The developers have sent a clear message that if they build substandard houses, they will bear the consequences.”
More than 2,000 high-rise buildings have combustible cladding that needs to be repaired, and thousands more are affected by other fire safety deficiencies. The government has announced that it will provide 5.1 billion pounds of public funds to help solve the cladding problem, but members of Congress estimate that the total cost of solving fire safety issues, including non-cladding defects, may be at least 15 billion pounds.
The British Cladding Action Group, which represents thousands of leaseholders who have disputes with developers and freeholders over who should pay up to £100,000 per household, said that suing the developers is not the solution.
It said in a tweet: “Most developers don’t exist, and where they exist, we don’t have the money to litigate.” “This is a lawyer’s get rich quick plan.”
The team that ended our cladding scandal said: “The tenant is now going bankrupt due to temporary fire safety measures and all the many other non-cladding issues. It’s annoying to keep listening. Robert Jenric Avoid full scale Building safety crisis. “
Janrik told the Andrew Marr show on BBC One: “I hope we haven’t reached this point. I hope more developers have paid for it.”
The Shadow Housing Minister Lucy Powell stated that the move “will not bring much relief to homeowners trapped in unsold and unsecured houses, because those who are already within the deadline find that the barriers to legal action are too high. , The cost is too high, and the result is invalid”.
She said: “The government needs to establish a construction engineering agency to evaluate, repair, find and certify each building, instead of doing minimal work and solving problems. Tenants should be protected by law from the impact of costs. Institutions should take over the right to pursue developers to ensure that polluters pay.”
[ad_2]
Source link
