[ad_1]
The court heard that telephone wiretapping revealed that a Sydney professor was accused of carrying out a strange false hate mail campaign, and the case received a major admission.
The court learned that a Sydney professor was accused of sending himself several pairs of underwear in a series of false threat letters, but was intercepted by the police and admitted that he had written two hate mails.
The New South Wales District Court’s trial of Dianne Jolley is drawing to a close, and the former dean of the Department of Science at the University of Technology, Sydney is defending allegations that she is responsible for the strange intimidation activities against her.
Jolley has been found not guilty on nine charges, but still faces 11 other charges, including fraud and communicating information that may make people worry about their safety.
She has pleaded not guilty, and her barrister Leah Rowan attacked her alleged motives as “nonsense” on Wednesday.
In his closing remarks, Crown Prosecutor Roger Kimball highlighted several key pieces of evidence, including closed-circuit television and telephone wiretapping, which he said supported Ms. Jolly’s writing from July to November 2019 The argument of 10 threatening letters and cards sent during the month.
In her testimony, Ms. Jolly admitted to writing one of the letters, when she explained that she found that the real threats against her were under too much pressure and that she wanted to be fired.
In a text message sent to a colleague on November 18th five days after her arrest, she admitted: “I know I broke down under pressure.
“So I did something to piggyback on the incident… something I’m not proud of.
“Obviously I am destroying myself recently. I think as a subconscious need to stop it.
“The irony is that I love this job, but the weight has been too heavy for too long. I’m sorry I couldn’t accept it, but now I am the only suspect.”
The jury also heard the police phone tapping. Someone overheard Jolly telling her personal assistant that she admitted to sending two letters.
“It happened in a series of things, and as things progressed, I found it really difficult,” Ms. Jolly said.
“Various things have happened, the pressures that have occurred, and the threats that have occurred. I find it difficult.”
She went on to say that after the initial support after the first wave of hate emails, it quickly “disappeared”.
“I made some wrong judgments. Two of the letters were sent by me because I wanted more support,” she said.
“I should go to a psychiatrist, now they blame me for everything.”
She testified that at the time the university was planning to close the Chinese medicine course, and faced with the proposed changes, she met with angry resistance from community members.
This included receiving a letter-before the first letter she was accused of-threatening to send her picture to the “Chinese Mafia.”
When threats began to spread on July 31, 2019, the university spared no effort to take security measures for Ms. Jolley, spending more than $127,000 to install CCTV cameras in her home and office and provide her with personal bodyguards.
She argued that the pressure became too great when someone broke into her backyard, cut her clothes into pieces and stole some of her underwear, which was later sent to her along with a threatening letter.
She said that after reviewing her contract, the only way she decided to immediately get rid of the $320,000 a year position was to incur allegations of misconduct. The jury was told that she thought the best way was to be caught on the spot and write a fake threat letter.
She admitted to typing and printing one of the letters in her office on the Ultimo campus of the University of Technology Sydney, but stated that she did not send any notes.
But Mr. Kimball said that Ms. Jolly’s fingerprints were found on the back of the stamp used to send one of the letters and believed that she was responsible for all these letters.
Ms. Rowan attacked the Crown case and her assumed motive.
She said that considering that others have already made a decision, Ms. Jolley does not need sympathy or support to push for the closure of Chinese medicine courses.
“The defendant has no reason to send a threatening letter to himself,” Ms. Rowan said.
“I don’t know whether the proposition of the crown is that Professor Jolley is some kind of drama queen, despite the fact that she never showed any behavior consistent with it.
“I don’t know if he implied that she was some kind of Machiavellian creature, using counterintuitive behavior to try to pass (close) the course that was already in progress.”
The trial continues with the defense’s closing submissions, and the jury is expected to retire early next week to consider its verdict.
More related stories
Baby boomers hyped up to become the next generation of stars
Even without coach Brian Gurgian’s number one player in the Olympic statement, the baby boomers not only overthrew the American team, but also defeated the giant killer Nigeria.
read more
Shark stories help to shelve the open ghost
Of the 11 Australians who lined up at the British Open this week, two were not born when Greg Norman won in 1993, but they are all following his immense footsteps.
read more
[ad_2]
Source link
