[ad_1]
Michael Clarke hit him back after dragging him into the endless fury surrounding the wrecking ball scandal at the Australian bowling alley.
Former Australian bowler Michael Clarke made an emotional statement in response to an emotional statement by the Australian bowler in response to Cameron Bancroft’s recent comments on the infamous ball-handling saga of 2018. .
In the interview protector, Bancroft suggested The Australian bowling team is aware of the illegal conspiracy In Cape Town-three years ago, the pacemaker Josh Hazlewood categorically denied it.
Kayo is your ticket to watch live broadcasts and on-demand best sports programs. New to Kayo? Try it free for 14 days now>
The 28-year-old’s comments made people wonder whether the banned three, David Warner and Steve Smith, were unfairly regarded as scapegoats in the “Salmon incident” scandal.
On Tuesday night, Mitchell Starc (Mitchell Starc), Pat Cummins (Pat Cummins), Nathan Lyon (Nathan Lyon) and Hazlewood (Hazlewood) four people published a joint report on the matter The statement denied any knowledge about tampering with the ball, and aimed at “past players”, said “we must know”, and called for an end to “spreading rumors.”
These remarks are considered to be an understatement of Clarke, who on Monday accused Cricket Australia of trying to wipe out the legendary wrecking ball under the carpet.
“They have to keep the ball on the bowl,” Clark told the Sky Sports Radio show Big breakfast.
“So if they rub the sandpaper on the ball, they must pass the ball back to the bowler hat, and the bowler hat must be hung on it before letting go.
“I can tell you now, if you go get a pen, just a pen, put a ‘1’ somewhere on my cricket bat, above the handle, on the edge of the bat, on the toe of the bat, on the face, In any position under the grip, I might notice only a little bit.
“If you participate in sports at the highest level, then you know that your tools are good, which is not funny.
“Can you imagine the ball being thrown back to the bowler hat, and the bowler hat knows nothing about it? Please.”
Clark fought back, pointing out a suspicious omission
Clarke went live again on stage on Wednesday, responding to the bowling alley’s statement that they unfairly targeted past players and reporters, but ignored the real reason everyone was talking about “Sandpaper Gate”-because of Ban Croft proposed.
He said: “When I comment on Cameron Bancroft’s remarks, I might offend some people.”
“From my point of view, this is certainly not done personally, especially when it comes to four bowling balls. I am a good friend of everyone.
“I think there are a lot of people, past players, reporters who made comments based on Cameron Bancroft’s speech and bowling coach David Sack’s speech. I think that after seeing the joint statement, this is what Really important.
“In this statement, what stood out to me was that they forgot how to conduct the dialogue. This is the comment of teammate Cameron Bancroft who was involved in the situation, and then The words of the bowling coach David Saker at the time. After reporters and past players like me, Adam Gilchrist (Adam Gilchrist) and current player Stuart Broad (Stuart Broad) read what they wrote, many people commented.
“I think these guys and the Australian cricket team need to remember how this conversation is going on, so in their statement, they should write on it: “We are proud of our honesty. Therefore, it is disappointing that our integrity has been questioned by some reporters and past players-you should probably put in your current teammates who were on the court, and the crime and bowling coaches are also there. You may have missed two people.
“The wording and wording of this statement is very clever, so I will not sit here and continue to talk about every word in the statement.
“I have said what I said. Of course it is not personal to them. I said what I said because I believe it.”
Geely (CA) and Bancroft (Bancroft) start a dialogue
Speaking of SEN Gilly and Gauss On Monday, Australia’s former voter Adam Gilchrist (Adam Gilchrist) said it was only a matter of time before the “name was named”.
Ben Oliver, the executive general manager of the cricket Australia national team, said in a speech to reporters on Monday afternoon The organization’s integrity department has contacted Bancroft, Giving him the opportunity to provide any other detailed information about this event.
“Apparently a thorough investigation has been conducted,” Oliver said.
“Some actions have been taken since then, and since then, everyone involved in the (national men’s team) has built incredible hard work to restore confidence and ultimately made the Australians proud of the Australian cricket team.
“If anyone has any new information about the incident, we will stick to it and we encourage people to come forward and discuss it with the Australian Cricket Club.
“In this case, our integrity team has contacted Cam (Bancroft), and if he has any new information, we will send him an invitation letter…or remind him that if he has any new information, except for his information In addition to his input, the initial investigation revealed that he has a way to do so.”
On Tuesday, CA’s interim CEO Nick Hockley confirmed Bancroft responded and said he had no other information to provide.
Hockley said: “Our integrity department contacted the media and asked him directly from Cam, whether he had any new information since the initial investigation. He came back and confirmed overnight that he had no new information. .” cricket.com.au.
“So, we thank Cam for his confirmation.”
Bowler hat statement
“To the Australian public. We are proud of our honesty. Therefore, it is disappointing that in recent days, our integrity has been questioned by some journalists and past participants regarding the Cape Town exams in 2018.”
“We have answered many questions on this issue, but we feel compelled to record the key facts again.
“Until we saw the image on the big screen in Newlands, we didn’t know if any foreign objects were brought onto the court to change the condition of the ball.
“For those users who insist on’we must know’ some kind of foreign object, even though there is no evidence, just because we are a bowler, we say this: In that test match, the referees were Nigel Llong and Richard Illingworth, regardless of whether it was received. Respected or experienced referees all inspected the ball after the image on the TV screen surfaced, and did not change the ball because there was no sign of damage.
“There is no excuse for what happened at Newlands Stadium that day. This is wrong and should never happen.
“We have all learned valuable experience, and we hope that the public can see better changes in the way of playing, behavior and respect for the game. We will continue to work hard to continuously improve the level of employees and participants.
“We respectfully request to stop spreading rumors and innuendo.
“It has been going on for too long, it’s time to continue.”
[ad_2]
Source link
