[ad_1]
widthWith so many leaks and briefings, there is almost no suspense in Downing Street’s announcement, except whether their podium is still there. I think there is always the possibility that someone will get divorced during the live broadcast.
So we already know what the so-called “Freedom Day” means, and we already know that if it comes, it will be July 19, unless it is postponed to another day.Johnson Commit to remove all legal restrictions: Regarding the number of people participating in sports events, theaters, gatherings, and the number of people allowed to open businesses. No masks, no social distancing, no Covid certificate, and no longer instruct people to work from home. The effect of guiding them back to the office is another matter, but the beauty of it is that it is not his problem.
The prime minister’s most important priority-you can see from what he has said many times-is to “shift from general government directives to relying on the personal responsibility of the people.” He has basically had enough of making all the decisions and hopes others will try. There was no obvious single candidate, and he threw it to all of us.
In a sense, this is a relief, because his instructions are always so popular. However, hearing his reasons is a bit disturbing. “We must be honest: if we cannot reopen society in the next few weeks, we must ask ourselves, when will we get back to normal?” At least technically, it is midsummer. We are outdoors, the school will be a holiday “fire line”, winter is the most powerful time of the virus, so if not now, when? He sounds more like a B&Q, a person who just lost patience, looking for the right white curtains more-what do you want him to do, go to the fixed classroom? ——Rather than carefully weighing the complex and often incomparable risks and benefits created by the country’s best minds as a person. Chris Whitty and Patrick Valance, two very minded people, can almost feel reluctantly standing next to him.
Unfortunately, more of us will die: if Johnson gets any pleasure from these briefings (it’s a shame to see the relationship between him and the limelight become such a shadow), it’s conveying that we must die. The news is more or less that he has been delivering information since the beginning of the crisis. This must be a boarding school matter. Whoever finishes the porridge soon can become a souvenir of the day.
The final decision will not be made until one week today, so in fact Johnson announced what we already know, according to his undecided timetable. If there is any novelty in the speech, it is that he slashed back from the “irreversible” nails he has worn so far. The fifth point of his plan-after continuing to vaccinate, remove all legal restrictions, continue to detect and track and maintain the red list system at the border-is to “do everything possible to avoid re-implementing restrictions.” The sharp-eyed Beth Rigby from Sky News pointed out that unless it needs to be reversed, irreversibility is not the real thing. Although she has him, it is not really “cautious” to lift restrictions in a country where 1/4 million people are infected. “You can’t say that I was not cautious and gave up irreversibility,” he replied. He didn’t say why not. It was more like a shrug. This sounds like “your problem”, not “my problem”.
The two members of the public and five reporters moved on. If the number rises sharply, if we are very close to complete vaccination, if we don’t know how effective the vaccine will protect against long-term Covid, if we don’t have data on vaccinating young people, why rush for success? However, for a person who is tired of the whole damn thing, and even more tired of the decision made by the person in charge of it, it is hard to argue with him in the end. So they can only ask Whitty and Vallance what they will do.
Just like when you get pension advice, but they are not allowed to tell you what to do, so you end up going to “what’s the pension? you Got? “When will they personally stop wearing masks? What do they think of football (as a potential super spread event, not a national victory)? In many of the scenarios listed, Whitty will continue to wear masks, but omitted “to prevent bastards Recognize me on the street”. I wonder if we will see his face again in real life.
[ad_2]
Source link
