[ad_1]
There is some debate about which sports should and should not be included in the Olympics, especially football. Let’s go to the rabbit hole!
Beautiful roughThe Guardian freelancer wrote: “Actually, I wrote for American football that women’s football no longer needs the Olympics. It’s better to emphasize mainland events, including what I call AAA-America, Africa, Asia.
“Sports that have a long history of games larger than their Olympic games should really try to do something different to make their Olympic games different. What about mixed team golf and tennis games?
“But the mistake people make is to think that an unimportant sport Their The country must be small Anywhere. U.S! U.S! U.S! Not going crazy for canoe/kayak slalom. But when I was reporting in Beijing, the reporter’s tent was overcrowded. I think half of Eastern Europe is there. “
Joel Eli Wrote: “The solution to football is to replace it with futsal. It is easy to complete. I also think that the Olympics should be one of the highest achievements of the sport, so for me, there is no football or golf, and it is incomprehensible. Why are they so opposed to including netball.”
Scott Think a fast game is a good game: “Olympic football should only include penalty kicks! Exciting to watch and fast! Yes!”
Another tweeter called Voice of Mysterious Man Provided a slightly weird suggestion: “Continue with the theme of the new Olympic movement, as a way to attract *young* audiences and contestants, how about nailing the tail to the donkey, the musical statue and Mr. Wolf? .”
Should we consult an expert? Jonathan Liu He wrote: “This may be the biggest problem of Olympic football: this problem feels unique to men’s football, but it may also include women’s games at that time. It seems that no one really knows what it is: development competitions, star cars, juggling. “
Read his full text.
[ad_2]
Source link
