[ad_1]
Meterark Drakeford is right. The threat to British unions must be seen as a major problem of our time.The chief minister of the Welsh Labour Party says the union has failed to keep up with decentralization Shattered before his eyesIn Cardiff, Drakeford saw no signs of remote interruption by the British government.
The Prime Minister said on Monday that Boris Johnson’s “aggressive unilateralism” made things worse, and his preference for “slogans, architecture, and the flying of flags” fueled separatism. But it doesn’t have to be this way. The difference should be the source of power, and if the UK has the decentralization reset it needs, the difference may be.Drakeford from a Position of new strength, In May’s parliamentary elections, both reversalists and separatists were sent away.
Historically, the worms in the buds of British decentralization are fragmentary. Northern Ireland In 1921, local autonomy was implemented within the Union. Scotland has had its own Whitehall department since 1885; it was not decentralized until 1999. The Wales office was established in 1965; decentralization was again implemented in 1999, with less power than in Scotland. There has never been a British office, nor a British parliament; the decentralization of power within England, which was once the land of local government, is arbitrary.
The 1999 reconciliation had an idealistic side, but it was fundamentally driven by political self-interest.The Labour Party embraced decentralization again in the 1990s, partly because it shared Scotland And Wales (though not England).However, this is mainly done to stop the wave of nationalism, if the Labour Party Scotland Once again facing the British Conservative government to adopt the aggression launched by Margaret Thatcher (Margaret Thatcher) there in the 1980s. In contrast, Wales is considered a secondary issue, while England is completely ignored.
The problem with the 1999 settlement is that the central threat scenario never occurred. On the contrary, in 2007, In any case, the Labour Party in Scotland collapsedAs a result, during the 14 years in power of the Labour Party and the Conservative Party, the Scottish National Party positioned itself as the champion of Scotland, in a union that it tirelessly tried to subvert and crush—rather than positioning itself as Scotland like the Labour Party. It wants to decentralize the work to the union.
The irony is that although the Labor Party’s basic hypothesis was never fulfilled in Scotland, it was WalesDuring the British Conservative government, the Labour Party has been in power in Cardiff Bay. Therefore, the Welsh experience is a more realistic test of the results envisaged in the 1999 settlement agreement. This also means that Drakeford should be heard as an unparalleled authority on his weaknesses.
So when he says that a new compromise is urgently needed, you better believe him. But this is no longer another set of piecemeal changes-additional taxation powers in Scotland and decentralization of police powers in Wales. For stability, the reset must be a compromise reached by the entire union, a joint British project based on the shared sovereignty of four different legislatures. This is beyond the self-interest of the Labour Party or any other party.
Obviously, the political issue is that no other government in the UK currently wants this. The Conservative Party is dismissive, even if the individual Conservative Party is not. SNP is full of hostility. The Irish nationalist part of the Northern Ireland power-sharing agreement has no intention of reforming to strengthen the alliance.
Nevertheless, it is now necessary to resolve this issue on a cross-party and non-party basis in order to curb the hope that Britain will continue to fall into separatism. The mission is to enable rational people with different missions to work for the common good in institutions that respect each other and share sovereignty. It must be a federalist in spirit, if not a strict federal structure. Subsidiarity and consent must be at its core. Most importantly, it must be centripetal rather than centrifugal, just like the current system.
This is a daunting challenge, especially considering that we are now located in Westminster and Holyrood, and this is in many ways inconsistent with the history of these islands. It left Drakeford no choice but to become his main voice in the UK, not just the voice of Wales.However, it cannot be used as a Welsh government document Reform our alliance Inevitably, leave England aside. The corrosive England-British omissions that are still at the core of the British Parliament’s solution—not to mention British football reports—will not be easily undone. But it cannot remain as it is.
[ad_2]
Source link
