BORIS JOHNSON to G7: Making the world “more feminine”

[ad_1]

Is this what the conservatives voted for, or is it what Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s new green wife requires of the G7 leaders? : “We are rebuilding buildings that are more environmentally friendly, fairer, more equal, and gender-neutral, perhaps in a more feminine way.” How does he define “more feminine”? How did “gender neutrality” come about? Who does it help?

Many voters in the West already believe that politicians and officials are manipulating them and are using the coronavirus panic to advance the left-wing agenda.

Now British Prime Minister Boris Johnson has come to stir up this fear and betray the conservatives who voted for him last year.

He told Cornwall’s G7 leaders what they wanted to discuss:

We are building buildings that are more environmentally friendly, fairer, more equal, more neutral, and perhaps more feminine.

pardon? Was this what conservatives voted for in last year’s British election, or did Johnson’s new green wife demand it?

Does he define “more feminine” without resorting to sexist stereotypes. Does it really need to be “more feminine”? Which leaders on that table were actually voted or made such a promise? How does the pandemic show a lack of femininity?

I am not surprised that the gender politics of the #MeToo era has become as sexist and oppressive as it claims to be against.

I suspect that it will also create the male sexists that it claims to oppose.in Korea There is now strong opposition:

When the “pinch hand” emoji – depicting the thumb and index finger about an inch apart – first appeared in 2019, the Internet happily started working.

“A new emoji that mocks men,” Deputy announcement On its website.

“May change pornography forever,” read Buzzfeed title.

“If you are one of the people who protested to the media that this emoji was used to laugh at small penises, then your secret is exposed,” Stephen Colbert Make fun of the “evening show”.

However, in South Korea, this image is not a joke.

In recent weeks, the hand, once used as a symbol by a now-defunct radical feminist group, has become a point of contention in a fierce struggle against gender and anti-feminism.

The patriarchal organization has begun to look for images contained in various posters and advertising campaigns, looking for companies, organizations or their employees that sympathize with feminism in a McCarthy way, with the goal of boycotting or a series of complaints…

For them, this sign proves that the hatred of men in Korea is widespread today, and that radical feminism is out of control. Their activities proved effective: large companies imposed disciplinary actions or demoted employees who used pinch ads, government departments and municipalities apologized and revised promotional materials, museums dismantled exhibitions, and celebrities saw their careers being threatened.

This incident is the latest uproar against the increasingly fierce gender and fair warfare that divides the country. It is also a demonstration of the force of young men who increasingly hate feminism, feel hurt by the women’s movement, and believe that the balance has actually been tilted. ????????????????????????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????????

This phenomenon is consistent with the strong opposition to feminism triggered by the Internet. China, This United Kingdom with Especially the U.S. Among Gen Z men, many accuse feminism of “going too far” and complain that men are unfairly slandered, falsely accused, ridiculed, and suppressed.

We now see the same strong opposition-but uglier-against the fate of blacks is also the fate movement and the new “critical racial theory” that promotes new anti-white racism.

Both the movement and theories claim to fight racism, but in reality they are deeply racism. Many followers do not want racial discrimination to end, but they want to win the game.

Disturbing whites are now responding in the same way — either becoming white supremacists or white surrender monkeys, apologizing for their race and begging for forgiveness. The first is dangerous and sinister, the second is despicable.

ASIO has warned about the rise of white supremacist groups, and I believe it is not a coincidence that it follows the fate of blacks and the rise of anti-Western Islamism. Racists on both sides are pushing us into a race war, asking us to stand aside-and the correct response is “Go to hell, both of you”.

Some disturbing examples of this new anti-white racism

[ad_2]

Source link