[ad_1]
one of stream media Music app I use to create a custom playlist for me, and it is very good at predicting which songs I will like. Does this make me boring?
-Play safely
Dear security game,
I once read somewhere that if you want to slowly drive someone crazy, please make up your mind. In a week or so, after they just say a few words, occasionally mutter to yourself, “I know you will so”. As far as I know, the logic is that by convincing a person that their thoughts are completely predictable, you will continue to weaken their initiative until they can no longer imagine themselves as an autonomous existence. I don’t know if this really works—I’ve never tried it like a sadist. But if its premise is correct, we must all slowly lose our minds. How many times are we reminded each day that our behavior can be accurately predicted? Predictive text Guess how we will succeed Reply to email. Amazon Hints at the book we have always wanted to read.I rarely finish typing now Google Inquiry before completing our ideas automatically, reminds us that our medical anxiety, our creative projects, and our relationship dilemma are completely unoriginal.
For those of us who grew up in the melting pot of late capitalist individualism, we believe that our souls are as unique as our fingerprints and as unrepeatable like snowflakes. The idea that our interests fall into easily discernible patterns is profound. , Even exist, uneasy. In fact, in “Caution”, I bet that your real anxiety is not that you are bored, but that you are not really free. If your taste can be easily inferred from your listening history and the data stream of “users like you” (borrowing the arrogant tone of the prediction engine), are you really making a choice? Is it possible that when you hear the Radiohead song you like in college, the indescribable and seemingly spontaneous joy is just the inflexible mathematical endpoint of the probability vector that determines your personality from birth ?
Although this anxiety may feel new, it stems from an older question about prediction and personal freedom, which was originally a response to the belief in divine foreknowledge. If God can see the future accurately, isn’t human behavior necessarily predetermined? Otherwise what shall we do? The scientific version of this question was put forward by French physicist Pierre-Simon Laplace in the 19th century. He imagined a superintelligence in the universe, which knew every detail of the universe until the exact position of all atoms. If this entity (now called the Laplace Demon) understands everything in the current world and has the wisdom “enough to submit data for analysis”, it can perfectly predict the future and reveal all events, including our own behavior, All belong to a long domino chain that can be traced back to the birth of the universe.
algorithm Predicting your music preferences is not as complicated as Laplace’s cosmic wisdom. But it still reveals to a lesser extent the extent to which your behavior is constrained by your past choices and certain generalized probabilities of human behavior. And it is not difficult to infer that once predictive technology becomes better at predicting our behavior and emotional state—maybe even beyond our own self-perception, then predictive technology may reveal our initiative. Will we accept their suggested marriage partner or vote for whom, just as we now accept their suggestion to see and read? Will the police arrest possible criminals before committing a crime? Minority report, Prompted by the oracle prediction of digital pre-tooth?A few years ago, Amazon applied for an “expected shipping” patent, hoping that the company would soon be able to correctly Guess our order (And start preparing to ship) before we buy.
If your own dullness is only the first excitement of this new reality, how should you respond? One option is to resist and try to prove the hypothesis is wrong. Misconduct. When you have a tendency to do something, do the exact opposite. Listen to the music you hate. Make the choice that the data stream will be rerouted.This is the solution that Dostoevsky’s narrator came up with Notes from the undergroundHe took irrational and self-harming actions only to prove that he was not enslaved by the rigid calculations of rational self-interest. This novel was written in the heyday of rational egoism, when some utopian thinkers believed that human behavior can be reduced to a series of logical rules to maximize happiness and create an ideal society. The narrator insisted that most people would find such a world intolerable because it would destroy their belief in personal freedom. We value our autonomy instead of all the comforts and advantages provided by scientific determinism-he believes that we will look for absurdity and even self-harm to prove that we are free. If science finally proves that human beings act according to these fatalistic rules, we will destroy ourselves “in order to give all these logarithms to the devil and live according to our own stupid will again!”
This is an exciting paragraph, but as predicted, it is not particularly prescient. Today, few of us are tortured by the comfort of predictive analytics. In fact, the convenience they provide is considered so popular that we often collude with them.exist Spotify, We “like” the songs we like, and contribute more fragments to the emerging mosaic of our digital personality.exist Tik Tok, We quickly scroll through posts that do not reflect our main interests, lest the omniscient algorithm mistake our curiosity for investment interest.Maybe you paused once or twice before watching the video Netflix Movies with different tastes from your usual taste, or hesitate before Google searches for religious issues, so as not to treat you as a true believer and distort your future search results. If you want to optimize your recommendations, the best way is to act as “yourself” as possible, maintaining a perseverance and timeless character-that is, to act in a way that is completely contrary to reality. The complexity of human nature.
Having said that, I do not recommend accepting irrational or behavior that is against one’s own interests. It will not make you happy, nor will it prove a point. Randomness is a bad substitute for true freedom. Instead, perhaps you should reconsider the unspecified premise of the query, that your identity is defined by your consumer choice. Your fear of becoming bored may not have anything to do with your so-called vanilla taste, but because these platforms allow us to see our soul through the lens of formulaic categories designed to make advertisers clear and legible. It’s easy to mistake our role for the main points in our profile: our relationship status, our professional affiliation, posts we like, memes and topics, the purchases we make, and the playlists we play are built .
[ad_2]
Source link
