[ad_1]
What I mean is that if a teacher tells young people something like this, “Oh, don’t worry about climate change; there are technologies under development,” which may increase cynicism. People know that the reaction is too easy; they know that the problem is not an easy one to solve. Although people want to quickly turn to hope, psychology shows that it is very important to face difficult emotions, to name and discuss them.
Why is it important to name them?
Talking about emotions with others—saying something to them and asking them what they mean to them—can not only help us deal with emotions, but it can also help us create common meaning. One person may experience worries in a completely different way than another person, or have a different set of worries. Some people may worry about their children; others may worry about the importance of biodiversity. By starting to talk about our concerns, we have grasped the problem, we can better understand what is at stake, and we begin to have a sense of control, so it will not become a kind of free-floating anxiety, which can be very difficult to deal with. This is the first step in dealing with these emotions.
Once we know how we feel, what’s the next step?
The next step is to look at the coping strategies we use, ask ourselves why we use them, and if there are other ways to cope. Problem-centered responseFor example, this is a very good strategy for specific problems that you can more or less fully control. You start to focus on the problem, and you can know what you can do.
In the context of climate change, what does this look and sound like?
You can say to yourself, “So I am here, worried about climate change. What can I control? I can read and learn more about the problem, start discussing with my friends what we can do, ride a bike or take a bus Instead of driving,” and you can do other things that focus on solving problems.
Then, there are meaning-centric responses. From the perspective of happiness and participation, this is considered the most constructive coping strategy. It promotes more positive emotions to cushion negative emotions that feel unbearable.
Actively respond to the challenges we face?
No, it has to do with switching perspectives between worry and hope, so you can see, “Yes, this is a very, very serious problem, I’m really worried” and see more and more people’s consciousness This is a good question, and the media is doing more coverage. Or remember it is difficult, but we have encountered difficult problems before.
In responding to the challenges of the scale of climate change, even if we cannot fully control it, we need to take active actions. Therefore, just focusing on the problem is not enough. You can see what you can do——Save house energy or Stop eating meat Or become Part of the Climate Group——But you need more things.A meaning-centric approach can help us face worries, so we can Become Focus on the problem. The best way is to combine two coping strategies.
[ad_2]
Source link
