[ad_1]
More importantly, the public interest of shared infrastructure includes things that are more intangible and broader than simply provided. By providing the same things in the same way everywhere, traditional infrastructure opens up a space for innovation—whether for business owners, electrical designers, or even sidewalk suppliers—where further experiments and inventions are possible . Whether it is a street grid or a power grid, the foundation of public infrastructure is the main source of creativity, resilience and meaning in our global culture. It makes community and cooperation possible.
The core of these possibilities lies not only in the universality of infrastructure, but also in its relative neutrality. When you can walk around, you may end up wandering around. You saw the whole city on the road, but for all those who don’t know you yet, no matter what kind of person you want to be, you are the same. In architecture, the space you find empty but with public facilities is not so much a burden as it is a cultural and social possibility. Just like running water, the city’s infrastructure supports contingency, anonymity, and innovation, which are at the core of all our best possibilities—and the generative role of cities in our economy and society.
This is also where the transition to the third era of information-led urban infrastructure represents a break with the past-and this matrix, Despite the foresight, it is possible to misread the future.
Year 1999, The virtual world of computing is still something we think is completely different from our real bodies and cities.like matrixOwn influence-William Gibson’s cyberspace, Neil StephensonThe metaverse—a digital and networked reality is another field, free from constraints such as space and gravity, and free from the constraints of our real world. this matrixTherefore, it is premised on a clear division: between reality (rebel ships glide through underground caves in the post-apocalyptic wasteland) and the virtual realm of city streets and office buildings in which most people live a simulated life. between. In contrast, in today’s urban data landscape, the effect of technology entering every body, object, and environment has always been to create an indelible parallel world with the real world—but, like a matrix, it still passes through very different the rule of.
This new world is full of our digital shadows.They follow our real steps and are born from the data tracks we leave when we post on social media, search on Google Maps, and order things. Amazon, Or leave a comment on the restaurant website. Some companies now prefer to use the term “digital twin” to describe this avatar-not even our ghost, but a reflection of our constant reinvention.
However, the virtual city is a mirror that can both reflect and deform; our virtual shared space is completely different from our physical shared space. When offline, our infrastructure is mainly public, and most of our actions are still free and unmonitored. The law governs our interactions. On the Internet, we exist in a completely privatized world, with weak governance and few civil liberties. It is entirely the reason for the existence of business. In order to simply access today’s digital environment, we allow a certain degree of control and intrusion-tracking and storing every fragment of our online life-we will never accept what we still call “reality”.
The main reason for this dilemma is precisely the nostalgic thoughts in the 1990s, which are implicit in matrix, Our real selves and virtual selves are separate. However, it should be obvious now that they are not.In fact, what does our compromise in the digital domain allow Google with Facebook Turn our data into physical supra-government economic power. Although these companies are not as real as the dormant human battery in the dystopian tower in the movie, they do live on our human nature-the extraction of value from our relationships, ideas, and experiences.
[ad_2]
Source link
