No one likes to be beaten. it hurts. But sometimes failure is so severe and so cruel that it triggers a much-needed debate about the systemic problems that caused it. Missed the opportunity to have this debate in 2018. But this time, thankfully, people are finally starting to solve the real problems that plague British cricket. Therefore, I hope this devastating ashes disaster will bring some benefits.
There is only one problem. Although people question the European Central Bank and ask whether our current domestic structure can produce a competitive tester, some observers who should have been better informed have given completely wrong answers. The tide driven by chaotic thinking is moving. You are really worried.
In the line of fire, of course the county champion. should be. As far as I know, it is currently very weak. The standards have fallen, and it is impossible to train batters with the skills and temperament required for cricket testing. The problem, however, is that critics have taken lazy choices and blamed the current malaise on the number of counties. This is a wrong position based on wrong assumptions. It also ignores some basic and undeniable facts.
First, there have been 18 counties in decades. And they did not prevent England from ranking first in the rankings and beating Australia in the recent 2010/11 season. More importantly, we should not forget that the Australians have not won in England since 2001. There are many problems with county cricket. It is obviously not produced at present, but the system works well after the introduction of the two divisions. The central contract in 2000 and 2002.
The introduction of the two departments is particularly important here. After all, those who casually talk about the elimination of “several” counties are said to have too few talents scattered, and ignore the fact that there are traditionally only 9 teams at level 1. The best players usually find their way to the top through mobile counties. When they do, they are usually very grateful for the education they receive in a fully professional second-line education.
Later developers and many young players lost to professional games in Australia. For example, county cricket gave more players the opportunity to take cricket as a career. This is the advantage of the existing structure in England. We have 18 colleges to discover and develop cricket nationwide, which is also a considerable advantage (although some counties perform significantly better than others). Therefore, reducing the number of counties will ultimately reduce the size of the game and reduce the number of opportunities for young players, even if the standard will improve in the short term.
Critics who advocate the elimination of counties also ignore the strength of British white ball cricket—a strength that is unprecedented in depth. Our 18 counties have recently trained the first batch of ODI World Cup champions in the country. Our record in the world T20 event is also very good. We won a final, reached the semi-finals this time, and then unfortunately lost the game.
Although some observers don’t like to give any credit to country cricket and would rather thank IPL, Big Bash and other franchised leagues for the white ball success for England, these people did not grasp the point. Why do British players perform so well in these leagues and have an immediate impact? Why are British players so popular? This is because the county cricket has fully prepared for them. By the way, the smaller counties play a vital role in the vitality of English white cricket. See how many so-called little fish have won T20 Blast.
So, what exactly is the problem of county cricket? Why is our test team so bad and our white ball team so good? After all, England may hit white balls in XI and still be very competitive in international competitions (just like Australia in the 1990s). For Stuart Law, Michael Di Venuto and Martin Love, please read Alex Hales, Liam Livingston and Joe Clarke. The difference is that England’s strength in depth is purely in white ball cricket.
The answer to these key questions is simple: everything is related to priorities. The European Central Bank has put all their eggs in the white ball basket, and the test team has paid the price for some time. This is not rocket science. we all know. Therefore, only one late adjustment is required.
The fact is that unless red ball cricket is prioritized again, it will be completely futile to eliminate counties. In fact, if only equal attention was paid to red ball cricket, it could make a huge difference. New Zealand and other countries have the competitive advantage of red and white teams at the same time, so England, which has a lot of resources, has no reason not to do exactly the same thing.
Rather than proposing new plans and complex formulas to solve England’s testing problems, it is better to say that the solution is very simple in theory. We just need to play more championship cricket in the summer because the batsman can trust the surface and learn to build the number of games.Alastair Cook has forgotten championships and cricket more than Tom Harrison knows, and he explains why this is so important here. This is all about the course of the bowlers hitting the ball in April/September, and the difficulties this poses for our aspiring hitters.
But of course, the timetable is not the only problem. The lack of high-quality overseas players and the plugging of Colpark’s loopholes also make it difficult for counties to carry out high-quality offenses. One of the reasons why county cricket was so popular in the 1990s is the number of high-quality players from abroad. As there are too many T20 leagues around the world, recruiting these players has become more difficult.
However, although this is indeed a problem, I don’t think it is insurmountable. For starters, the three largest (and therefore the most profitable) T20 leagues have no conflict with the peak of the English summer. IPL, Big Bash and PSL all ended at the end of May. Only the Caribbean Premier League, which starts in August, may hinder county-level recruitment activities. Therefore, the county should still be able to attract some celebrities-as they did in the past.
Due to the lack of kolpaks, I hope to see the European Central Bank increase the number of overseas players allowed to be compensated. Maybe they can even subsidize some big-name signings? It happens in other sports. Of course, the European Central Bank can make the most of part of the £1 billion TV deal-although Covid-19 and the huge amount of money spent on a hundred dollars (eroded the ECB’s reserves) make this more difficult in the short term .
Of course, if the European Central Bank finally abandons the “hundred people” and uses Blast with two divisions and the same marketing to create more space for first-class cricket in the midsummer, it will be of great help. However, this will not happen for a while, because they cannot break the TV deal and refund the funds. In addition, of course, they will never admit that the 100s was a huge success, although squeezing another game into the already crowded British summer will always create huge problems.
So what can our ordinary supporters do?Suggest everyone to join Cricket Supporters Association. This is the only tool we have to push our agenda. It is also important to continue to challenge those who advocate dividing the county. After all, some people in the European Central Bank may seize the opportunity! Don’t let them use their failures to gain another personal success.
Instead, point those who slander county cricket towards things like this, This is a failed autopsy of the ashes of the Australians in 2013. It lamented the problems in Australia’s first-class system and portrayed county cricket, which has a large number of matches and gray-haired professional players, as an excellent intensive school.You can even point to them This articleAmong them, the aforementioned Stuart Law and Michael Di Venuto described county cricket as a high-quality environment that really helps train players.
Most importantly, don’t let them forget that the county championship was the strongest first-class domestic competition in the world ten to fifteen years ago. It pushed England to the top of the test rankings and trained many players who seamlessly upgraded to test cricket. For example, Strauss, Cook, Trott, and Prior all made hundreds of cards when they debuted.
Finally, we must challenge someone like Kevin Pietersen. He suggested Baishi Franchise system For top-notch cricket. Although I often find KP’s views very interesting because they rarely reflect the mainstream, I worry that his views are very wrong. After all, the franchise does not produce players. Who will invest in the Red Ball franchise at this time?
The fact is that when Peterson admitted that “when I first started playing first-rate cricket in England, the intensity of the county championship was like a test match…as hard as anything”.
Well, instead of throwing out the baby with the bath water, we just need to go back to those days. The structure of 18 counties, its two departments, and the numerous opportunities for professionals at home and abroad can indeed once again build a competitive testing team. So let’s implement it.
There must be a way. We just need to make sure that there is a will. We do this by pushing the debate in the right direction. Otherwise, the British cricket really lost.