T20 Blast, 2022 Match 56 DUR vs WAS Match Prediction Who Will Win Today

[ad_1]

Match 56 of the T20 Blast, 2022 will see the clash between Durham and Warwickshire at Riverside Ground, Chester-le-Street on Wednesday, 8 June 2022. Keep reading to find out the T20 Blast, 2022 Match 56 DUR vs WAS Match Prediction.

Here is our T20 Blast, 2022 Durham vs Warwickshire Match 56 Prediction

Let’s find out who will win T20 Blast, 2022 Match 56 between Durham vs Warwickshire Today Match Prediction

Case 1: If Durham bats first

Result prediction: Warwickshire will win the match by 6 wickets

Case 2: If Warwickshire bats first

First Innings score prediction: Warwickshire will score 175-185

Result prediction: Warwickshire will win the match by 10-20 runs

DUR vs WAS Squad

Durham Squad:

Alex Lees, Graham Clark, Jack Burnham, Michael Jones, Sean Dickson, Will Young, Alex Thomson, Ben Raine, Ben Stokes, Cameron Steel, Matt Salisbury, Paul Coughlin, Scott Borthwick (C), Cameron Bancroft, David Bedingham, Stuart Poynter (WK), Brydon Carse, Liam Trevaskis, Mark Wood, Matty Potts, Ned Eckersley, Chris Rushworth, Jack Campbell, Oliver Gibson

Warwickshire Squad:

Adam Hose, Dom Sibley, Dan Mousley, Ed Pollock, Hanuma Vihari, Pieter Malan, Robert Yates, Sam Hain, Alex Thomson, Chris Woakes, Jacob Bethell, Matthew Lamb, Tim Bresnan, Will Rhodes (C), Michael Burgess (WK) , Craig Miles, Danny Briggs, Ethan Brookes, George Furrer, George Garrett, Henry Brookes, Jake Lintott, Liam Norwell, Manraj Johal, Oliver Hannon-Dalby, Olly Stone, Ryan Sidebottom

DUR vs WAS head to head

DUR vs WAS Total Matches: 18

Durham Won: 6

Warwickshire Won: 9

No Result: 2

Tied: 0

Abounded: 1

Stay updated with all the cricketing action, follow Cricadium on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram

Disclaimer

Match Predictions are for entertainment purpose only. We don’t get involved in or promote betting or gambling. Also, We strongly discourage behaviours of participating in illegal activities related to cricket. Our experts try to be as correct as possible, but we do not guarantee 100% correctness.



[ad_2]

Source link