[ad_1]
Match 47 of the T20 Blast, 2022 will see the clash between Warwickshire and Nottinghamshire at Edgbaston, Birmingham on Sunday, 5 June 2022. Keep reading to find out the T20 Blast, 2022 Match 47 WAS vs NOT Match Prediction.
Here is our T20 Blast, 2022 Warwickshire vs Nottinghamshire Match 47 Prediction
Let’s find out who will win T20 Blast, 2022 Match 47 between Warwickshire vs Nottinghamshire Today Match Prediction
Case 1: If Warwickshire bats first
First Innings score prediction: Warwickshire will score 175-185
Result prediction: Warwickshire will win the match by 5-15 runs
Case 2: If Nottinghamshire bats first
First Innings score prediction: Nottinghamshire will score 165-175
Result prediction: Warwickshire will win the match by 3 wickets
WAS vs NOT Squad
Warwickshire Squad:
Adam Hose, Dom Sibley, Dan Mousley, Ed Pollock, Hanuma Vihari, Pieter Malan, Robert Yates, Sam Hain, Alex Thomson, Chris Woakes, Jacob Bethell, Matthew Lamb, Tim Bresnan, Will Rhodes (C), Michael Burgess (WK) , Craig Miles, Danny Briggs, Ethan Brookes, George Furrer, George Garrett, Henry Brookes, Jake Lintott, Liam Norwell, Manraj Johal, Oliver Hannon-Dalby, Olly Stone, Ryan Sidebottom
Nottinghamshire Squad:
Alex Hales, Joe Clarke, Ben Duckett, Tom Moores (wk), Daniel Christian, Steven Mullaney (C), Samit Patel, Luke Fletcher, Jake Ball, Zak Chappell, Tom Barber, Toby Pettman, Stuart Broad, Matthew Carter, Liam Patterson -White, Harry Gurney, Dane Patterson, Brett Hutton, Haseeb Hameed, Sol Budinger, Ben Compton, Ben Slater, Dane Schadendorf, Peter Trego, Lyndon James, Joey Evison
WAS vs NOT head to head
WAS vs NOT Total Matches: 20
Warwickshire Won: 7
Nottinghamshire Won: 11
No Result:
Tied: 0
Abounded: 2
Stay updated with all the cricketing action, follow Cricadium on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram
Disclaimer
Match Predictions are for entertainment purpose only. We don’t get involved in or promote betting or gambling. Also, We strongly discourage behaviours of participating in illegal activities related to cricket. Our experts try to be as correct as possible, but we do not guarantee 100% correctness.
[ad_2]
Source link
