[ad_1]
Match 44 of the T20 Blast, 2022 will see the clash between Hampshire and Sussex at The Rose Bowl, Southampton on Saturday, 4 June 2022. Keep reading to find out the T20 Blast, 2022 Match 44 HAM vs SUS Match Prediction.
Here is our T20 Blast, 2022 Hampshire vs Sussex Match 44 Prediction
Let’s find out who will win T20 Blast, 2022 Match 44 between Hampshire vs Sussex Today Match Prediction
Case 1: If Hampshire bats first
First Innings score prediction: Hampshire will score 150-160
Result prediction: Sussex will win the match by 7 wickets
Case 2: If Sussex bats first
First Innings score prediction: Sussex will score 180-190
Result prediction: Sussex will win the match by 15-25 runs
HAM vs SUS Squad
Hampshire Squad:
Ben McDermott, Ben Brown, James Vince, Joe Weatherley, Ross Whiteley, Nick Gubbins, Felix Organ, Aneurin Donald, Toby Albert, Fletcha Middleton, Liam Dawson, James Fuller, Ian Holland, Keith Barker, Tom Prest, Kyle Abbott, Nathan Ellis , Scott Currie, Chris Wood, Brad Wheal, Mason Crane, Mohammad Abbas, Harry Petrie, John Turner
Sussex Squad:
Luke Wright, Delray Rawlins, Ravi Bopara, Henry Crocombe, Tymal Mills, Mohammad Rizwan, Tim Seifert, Josh Philippe, Ali Orr, Tom Alsop, Oliver Carter, Travis Head, Harrison Ward, Tom Clark, Tom Hinley, Fynn Hudson-Prentice, Tom Haines, James Coles, Danial Ibrahim, Rashid Khan, Steven Finn, Will Beer, Ollie Robinson, George Garton, Jack Carson, George Burrows, Jamie Atkins, Sean Hunt, Archie Lenham, Philip Salt, Calum MacLeod, David Wiese, Aaron Thomason , Mitchell Claydon, Stuart Meaker
HAM vs SUS head to head
HAM vs SUS Total Matches: 36
Hampshire Won: 16
Sussex Won: 17
No Result: 3
Tied: 0
Abounded: 3
Stay updated with all the cricketing action, follow Cricadium on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram
Disclaimer
Match Predictions are for entertainment purpose only. We don’t get involved in or promote betting or gambling. Also, We strongly discourage behaviours of participating in illegal activities related to cricket. Our experts try to be as correct as possible, but we do not guarantee 100% correctness.
[ad_2]
Source link
