[ad_1]
The Match 9 of the The Hundred Womens Competition 2023 will see the clash between Oval Invincibles Women and Welsh Fire Women at the Kennington Oval, London on, Sunday, 6 August 2023. Keep reading to find out The Hundred Womens Competition 2023Match 9 OV-W vs WAL-W Match Prediction.
Oval Invincibles Women vs Welsh Fire Women head-to-head:
Let’s have a look at the head-to-head record for OV-W vs WAL-W prediction. This will help us to understand who will win today’s The Hundred Womens Competition 2023 Match 9 prediction or who has a higher chance of winning between Oval Invincibles Women vs Welsh Fire Women.
OV-W vs WAL-W Predicted Playing XIs
Oval Invincibles Women Predicted XI:
Hannah Rainey, Suzie Bates, Paige Scholfield, Lauren Winfield, Cordelia Griffith, Beth Langston, Dane van Niekerk, Mady Villiers, Marizanne Kapp, Eva Gray, Alice Capsey, Claudie Cooper, Ryana Macdonald-Gay, Kira Chathli, Sophia Smale, Lizzie Scott
Welsh Fire Women Predicted XI:
TT Beaumont (C), L Harris, SIR Dunkley, A Griffiths, Hayley Matthews, GA Elwiss, G Davies, SJ Bryce (wk), FR Davies, S Ismail, A Hartley
OV-W vs WAL-W head to head
OV-W vs WAL-W Total Matches: 5
Oval Invincibles Women Won: 5
Welsh Fire Women Won: 2
No Result: 0
Tied: 0
Here is our OV-W vs WAL-W ODI Match Prediction
Case 1: If Oval Invincibles Women bats first
First Innings score prediction: Oval Invincibles Women will score 150-160
Result prediction: Welsh Fire Women will win the match by 5 wickets
Case 2: If Welsh Fire Women bats first
First Innings score prediction: Welsh Fire Women will score 135-145
Result prediction: Welsh Fire Women will win the match by 15-25 runs
OV-W vs WAL-W Today Match Prediction:
Stay updated with all the cricketing action, follow Cricadium on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram
DisclaimerMatch Predictions are for entertainment purposes only. We don’t get involved in or promote betting or gambling. Also, We strongly discourage behaviors of participating in illegal activities related to cricket. Our experts try to be as correct as possible, but we do not guarantee 100% correctness
[ad_2]
Source link
