GG vs SWR Match Prediction International League T20 2024 Match 22


Match 22 of the International League T20 2024 will see the clash between Gulf Giants and Sharjah Warriors at the Dubai International Cricket Stadium, Dubai, on Sunday, 4 February 2024. Keep reading to find out the GG vs SWR Match Prediction for Match 22 International League T20 2024

Venue Stats

Dubai International Cricket Stadium, Dubai,

GG vs SWR Predicted XIs for Today’s Match

Gulf Giants’s Predicted XI:

Jamie Smith (wk), James Vince (c), Jordan Cox, Shimron Hetmyer, Usman Khan, Carlos Brathwaite, Dominic Drakes, Chris Jordan, Mujeeb Ur Rahman, Zuhaib Zubair, Richard Gleeson

Sharjah Warriors’s Predicted XI:

N Dickwella (wk), Johnson Charles, M Deyal, SC Williams, Basil Hameed, L Gregory (C), DR Sams, JK Fuller, Chris Woakes, M Theekshana, Muhammad Jawadullah

Gulf Giants vs Sharjah Warriors head-to-head:

Let’s have a look at the head-to-head record for the GG vs SWR prediction. This will help us to understand who will win today’s International League T20 2024 Match 22 prediction or who has a higher chance of winning between Gulf Giants vs Sharjah Warriors.

GG vs SWR head-to-head

GG vs SWR Total Matches: 5

Gulf Giants Won: 1

Sharjah Warriors Won: 3

No Result: –

Tied: –

Here is our GG vs SWR Match Prediction

Case 1: If Gulf Giants Bats First

First Innings score prediction: Gulf Giants will score 170-180

Result prediction: Sharjah Warriors will win the match by 5 wickets

Case 2: If the Sharjah Warriors bat first

First Innings score prediction: Sharjah Warriors will score 175-185

Result prediction: Gulf Giants will win the match by 4 wickets

Stay updated with all the cricketing action, follow Cricadium on WhatsApp, Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram


Match Predictions are for entertainment purposes only. We don’t get involved in or promote betting or gambling. Also, we strongly discourage behaviors of participating in illegal activities related to cricket. Our experts try to be as correct as possible, but we do not guarantee 100% correctness.


Source link

Recommended For You

About the Author: News Center