CNT vs WEF Match Prediction Super Smash 2024 Eliminator

[ad_1]

Eliminator of the Super Smash 2024 will see the clash between Canterbury Kings and Wellington Firebirds at the Seddon Park, Hamilton, on Friday, 26 January 2024. Keep reading to find out the CNT vs WEF Match Prediction for Eliminator Super Smash 2024

Venue Stats

Seddon Park, Hamilton,

CNT vs WEF Predicted XIs for Today’s Match

Canterbury Kings’s Predicted XI:

Rachin Ravindra, Nick Greenwood, Nick Kelly(C), Muhammad Arslan Abbas, Michael Bracewell, Jesse Tashkoff, Callum McLachlan (WK), Nathan Smith, Logan van Beek, Peter Younghusband, Ian McPeake

Wellington Firebirds’s Predicted XI:

Chad Bowes, Tom Latham, Henry Nicholls, Cole McConchie(C), Mitchell Hay (WK), Michael Rippon, Bevon Jacobs, Zak Foulke, Angus McKenzie, Michael Rae, William O’Rourke

Canterbury Kings vs Wellington Firebirds head-to-head:

Let’s have a look at the head-to-head record for the CNT vs WEF prediction. This will help us to understand who will win today’s Super Smash 2024 Eliminator prediction or who has a higher chance of winning between Canterbury Kings vs Wellington Firebirds.

CNT vs WEF head-to-head

CNT vs WEF Total Matches: 5

Canterbury Kings Won: 3

Wellington Firebirds Won: 2

No Result: – 0

Tied: – 0

Here is our CNT vs WEF Match Prediction

Case 1: If Canterbury Kings Bats First

First Innings score prediction: Canterbury Kings will score 185-195

Result prediction: Canterbury Kings will win the match by 15-25 runs

Case 2: If the Wellington Firebirds bat first

First Innings score prediction: Wellington Firebirds will score 180-190

Result prediction: Wellington Firebirds will win the match by 10-20 runs

Stay updated with all the cricketing action, follow Cricadium on WhatsApp, Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram

Disclaimer

Match Predictions are for entertainment purposes only. We don’t get involved in or promote betting or gambling. Also, we strongly discourage behaviors of participating in illegal activities related to cricket. Our experts try to be as correct as possible, but we do not guarantee 100% correctness.



[ad_2]

Source link