[ad_1]
Barbados Royals will take on Guyana Amazon Warriors in the Match 22 of Caribbean Premier League, 2022 on September 18th, at the Brian Lara Stadium, Tarouba, Trinidad. Keep reading to find out BR vs GUY Dream11 Prediction: CPL 2022 Match 22 BR vs GUY Dream11 Team Tips for Today CPL Match.
Squads of both teams
Barbados Royals Squad:
Jason Holder, David Miller, Devon Thomas, Rahkeem Cornwall, Kyle Mayers, Oshane Thomas, Justin Greaves, Joshua Bishop, Hayden Walsh, Nyeem Young, Obed McCoy, Mujeeb Ur Rahman, Azam Khan, Quinton de Kock, Corbin Bosch, Teddy Bishop, Ramon Simmonds
Guyana Amazon Warriors Squad:
Tabraiz Shamsi, Veerasammy Permaul, Ronsford Beaton, Shimron Hetmyer, Keemo Paul, Romario Shepherd, Shai Hope, Odean Smith, Chanderpaul Hemraj, Imran Tahir, Colin Ingram, Gudakesh Motie, Jermaine Blackwood, Matthew Nandu, Junior Sinclair, Paul Stirling, Heinrich Klaasen
Let’s find out the BR vs GUY Dream11 Prediction for today’s CPL 2022 Match 22. Which will help you to make the perfect dream11 team for today’s match.
Here is Our BR vs GUY Dream11 Prediction for Today CPL 2022 Match 22
Here is the Best Dream11 Team for Today CPL Match 22 BR vs GUY
Captain: Quinton de Kock
Vice-Captain: Heinrich Klaasen
Wicketkeeper: Quinton de Kock, Heinrich Klaasen
Batsmen: David Miller, Shimron Hetmyer, K. Mayers
All-Rounders: Jason Holder, Corbin Bosch, Romario Shepherd
Bowlers: Imran Tahir, Tabraiz Shamsi, Obed McCoy
Here is how the Best Dream11 Team for Today CPL 2022 Match 22 BR vs GUY looks like
BR vs GUY Dream11 Prediction: CPL 2022 Match 22 Barbados Royals vs Guyana Amazon Warriors Dream11 Team Tips for Today CPL Match – September 18th, 2022
Stay updated with all the cricketing action, follow Cricadium on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram
Disclaimer
This Blog is for entertainment purpose only. We don’t get involved in or promote betting or gambling. Also, We strongly discourage behaviors of participating in illegal activities related to cricket. Our experts try to be as correct as possible, but we do not guarantee 100% correctness.
[ad_2]
Source link