Despite its unscrupulous beauty, crickets have always been vulnerable to changes in the weather. The first sign of rain would make venue staff scramble to cover the ticket gates. In the past, something called “bad light” might also stop playing. Although frustrating the players, it means that fans can adjourn to the bar earlier. This unpredictability tends to shorten the duration of the game, but it inadvertently lays the foundation for a one-day game.
Although the tepid climate may contribute to this theory, it is the increasingly fragile wallet that triggers the reality. By the 1950s, the game had fallen into the abyss of a financial crisis. The traditional four-day county-level competition no longer pays off. Something had to be done, MCC acted with bureaucratic efficiency; they formed a subcommittee at the end of the 1956 season. Many options were considered, including changes to the tournament format and game rules. A report was submitted in January 1957 and its recommendations were properly implemented. Strangely, the proposal to establish a one-day system was quietly ignored.
In hindsight, the lack of action made the sport face further uncertainty. It wasn’t until 1961 that MCC gave in and stamped a rubber stamp on the plan to create a one-day competition.As Edward Griffiths pointed out in his excellent one-day history, the analogy of tooth extraction is appropriate Glorious years; it is ‘Perhaps the longest discussion in the history of sports”However, despite reluctantly accepting this principle, a new game sponsored by Gillette will begin in 1963.
The world’s first official one-day game was held at Old Trafford on January 1stYingshi May 1963. There are 17 first-class counties, and the knockout format requires preliminary rounds. Lancashire and Leicestershire attracted short shots with 65 points. Brian Booth and Robert Entwhistle started for Lancashire, while Charles Spencer of Leicestershire Win the first game.
The healthy attendance rate is in stark contrast to the two elderly people and one dog who usually watch county games. The home team scored a huge victory with a score of 304-9, and Peter Marner scored an outstanding 121 points. Before Manchester’s climate was brought under control, Harold’Dickie’ Bird defeated Leicestershire by 7 points. In a wonderful satire, it rained and the game entered the second day. Lancashire eventually won the game with an easy advantage of 101 times. Fans have seen 507 points scored in 118 games and two separate centuries. This may be an appetizer to the main course, but it must be satisfying.
The show is finally on its way and provides an important new source of income for the game. Sussex won the inaugural competition and produced four different winners in the first six years. The Gillette Cup continues to grow and has become the blueprint for the limited edition competition system. An American razor company sponsored the most English games, which is undoubtedly a turning point in fate. With a sense of evangelical mission, Gillette began sponsoring similar competitions in South Africa, Australia, the West Indies and New Zealand. By 1969, the Johns Players League joined the calendar with 40 games on Sunday afternoon. But what about one day of international cricket? Would the behemoth of the longhouse allow such vulgarity?
In the same year, Ben Brocklehurst, the chairman of Cricketer magazine, suddenly had an inspiration. The Cricket World Cup in which seven recognized test nations participate is coveted. England’s success in the 1966 World Cup is still fresh in memory and is a compelling template for equivalent competitions. However, Brockhurst was hampered by the House of Lords Subcommittee and the recently established Test and County Cricket Committee. Looking back, it is difficult to see exactly what their problem was. Brocklehurst received a third-party sponsorship worth £50,000 (a substantial amount in the late 1960s) and provided the opportunity to promote cricket on the world stage.
Brocklehurst participated in the 1970/71 Ashes Series in Australia and curiously attended the first day of international competitions. This was purely accidental and was driven by the weather conditions at the time. The third test in Melbourne was eliminated; three days of heavy rain caused it to be abandoned and rescheduled in late January. Sir Donald Bradman, who was a member of the Australian Control Board at the time, asked what might be done on the last day of the suspension of the test. He pointed out that the weather forecast was favorable and thought it might save something from the vacant period on Tuesday.
Tang It is recommended to have a one-day match between Australia and England. With inexplicable conceit, the MCC official asked time to consider his proposal. Sir Cyril Hawke and Guby Allen returned from the negotiation and agreed to Bradman’s proposal. However, further meetings are needed to agree that the two competing teams can be called Australia and England. With white smoke from the secret meeting, a major decision has been made.
The first official one-day international match was held at the Melbourne Cricket Ground on May 5.day January 1971. The game consists of 40 8-balls on each side, and each bowler is allocated a maximum of 8 balls. When the respective captains Bill Laurie and Ray Illingworth met at the ticket gate, 46,000 people participated in the MCG. The former won the toss and allowed England to enter the batsman. The rain in the first five days greatly slowed the speed of the field. England scored only 7 boundaries in 39.4 games with a total score of 190-9. John Edrich topped the list with 82 points, but the partners slowly ran out. Ray Illingworth and Colin Cowdrey were fired for singles, and Ashley Mallett scored 3 points for the best bowling stats with 34 points. Australia reached the goal of 191 with 5 wickets and 5 points. Ian Chappell and Doug Walters shared a key partnership with a score of 66. Ray Illingworth made up for his failure to hit the ball with 50 3-pointers.
England regained the ashes with a 2-0 series victory, thus rebounding with a strong style. But eight years after the launch of similar domestic projects, ODI was launched and operational. The first ODI series was held in August 1972, when England defeated Australia 2-1. As for Ben Brocklehurst and his grand plan, he then started a tortuous snake ladder game with the House of Lords Subcommittee. However, his vision was never fully realized. The World Cup established in 1975 has striking similarities with the Brockhurst Project. At least he was an architect, but he never really got the honor he deserved. Brocklehurst later admitted that he naively believed that outsiders could influence those who ran the game in the 60s and 70s.As Mark Baldwin in The history of the Cricket World Cup, “the establishment of this day…is suspicious of anyone trying to enter…a relatively small and comfortable little world”.
The Benson & Hedges Cup was launched in the 1972 season, and a third game was added to the domestic one-day itinerary. Ironically, its demise was due to a new format designed by the European Central Bank in 2003. In order to attract young audiences, T20 was introduced for the first time. 20 games on each side will reduce the game time to about three hours, so it is more suitable for TV schedules.
Further reduction does not help the integrity of the sport and obscures any tactical awareness. It was a fierce game, and the attention was shifted to the batter.Invention Death bowler The increase in tension really missed the point. T20 matches are basically won and lost by the batter. Even so, this format was very successful and quickly spawned more games. Following the Indian Premier League are equivalent T20 leagues in Australia, West Indies, Bangladesh, Pakistan and Afghanistan. The T20 international was quickly labeled the biennial T20 World Cup.
With the commercial success of T20, one must wonder why it is necessary to introduce the fourth version of the game. But the “hundred people” featuring the regional franchise system has become a reality. Fans can say what they like, but no matter what they decide to call them, every 100 balls is actually 16 balls on each side. The rules keep the game away from its origins, not what many people are willing to admit. The TV reports are too intrusive, and the screen is full of statistics; to this extent, it feels more like a game on the PlayStation.
In addition, Beeb’s report is incredibly patronizing. When the host explains the rules, it is like a version of a game school…It’s like cricket… just shorter. Frankly, it’s not even close to cricket. It remains to be seen whether the Hundred People’s Association provides new impetus to this sport. When the Gillette Cup started in 1963, I was probably an opponent. See what happened there. It would be nice if Sir Cyril Hawke and Guby Allen were present today; would they form a subcommittee and discuss it for five years?