[ad_1]
I gave Mine (Quite simple) A few days ago we planned to revive our domestic games. Today, it’s Billy Crawford’s turn. Does his comprehensive plan have legs? Let us know in the comments. cheers.
Australia’s ashes series usually ends in humiliation. My childhood was defined as listening to England hitting a ball crash late at night on a portable radio under my duvet. However, this feels different. This is not another paste we will bounce through running and wickets next year. This time, I really feel that something is broken.
England won one of six test matches in the summer of 2021 and lost three. It can be said that if there were no weather intervention, they could have lost five. The Australian team looked completely broken. The batsman does not have basic test game skills; the bowling balls have been inconsistent, and the choice is completely baffling.
If the British cricket is broken, the logic is that it needs to be repaired. So this is my 5-point plan to save our country’s summer sports.Some of the conclusions in the plan may make some people feel uncomfortable, but if we want cricket testing in this country to continue as a reliable sport, we simply can’t go on.
1 Divide the county champions into three groups of six
I will start by saying that I love the County Championship as much as many of you. It needs to be cherished and preserved, not to be thrown aside like Kevin Peterson and others hope. However, it does not work in the current format. The green court rewards ordinary bowlers, making it impossible for the batter to develop sound long-form hitting techniques. Playing in the spring and fall means that players will not encounter the situations they encounter in Test Cricket.
However, we must accept the reality of the world we live in. The tournament will never again become the core of the cricket summer. It attracts so few people and so little income that if the shorter format is pushed to one side, it can accommodate four days of cricket throughout the summer.
The number of games also dilutes the quality, and the intricate schedule makes it difficult for new fans to understand. The conference structure did not work at all, and resulted in months of meaningless matches played by teams that did not participate in winning the championship title.
In this regard, the simplest solution is to divide the tournament into three divisions, with six teams in each group, and each team playing at home and away. This will ensure that each team has ten four-day cricket matches, giving players plenty of opportunities to hone their red ball skills.
These can be easily divided to suit everyone. The first round will be played in April, followed by three rounds in May. June will provide opportunities for two rounds of championship cricket, with good batting conditions, and the first round in July, all of which will be played around the counties in the T20 Blast. Then there will be a round of matches during the 100s to provide fans of longer matches with the opportunity to watch cricket and give young players a chance to test their skills. Then there will be another round of competition at the end of the 100s at the end of August, and the last set of competitions will be held in the first week of September.
The one-day cup will be redesigned as a direct knockout, and the national county team will enter the first round, similar to the FA Cup. The schedule will take place in April, May and early June on the Sunday after the championship game, just like the old Sunday league. This means that there will be four and one day matches almost every weekend, giving parents ample opportunities to take their children to cricket.
I can already hear the howls of protest from the county members who will be trapped in the third division. They have lost their best players to players in higher leagues. My own county, Northamptonshire, is probably one of them. In this regard, I would say that this is the reality of competitive sports. After all, we have not merged the four divisions of English professional football so that the Wycombe Rangers can play against Manchester United every week.
The two-up and two-down system will provide opportunities for counties to move between departments. Of course, the danger is that counties in the third sector will lose members and income and become financially unsustainable. There is a simple solution to this, which brings me to the second point…
2 Use the revenue from The Million to support the rest of the game
Whether we like it or not, a hundred people will stay. As its voice opponent, it is difficult for me to say this, but it has been successful so far. More people are therefore interested in cricket, which is undeniable. Participation in social media posts is increasing, as are clips on the BBC website. Earth-shaking changes have also taken place in the women’s competition. Without the Centurion, it is hard to imagine that 16-year-old Alice Capsey would have the opportunity to perform in front of The Oval’s 10,000 fans and demonstrate her skills in such a spectacular way.
I saw the evidence of its success with my own eyes. Colleagues who have never shown any interest in cricket before are now buying 100 season tickets and calling me to their computer to show me the latest clips on social media. The big question that we cynics still ask is whether this will translate into an interest in longer forms of cricket? I know this may only be anecdotal evidence, but in my experience, this is happening.
I usually track test scores on my work computer quietly, because I know that no one else will be interested in them. The England vs. India test series is a hot topic this summer, and colleagues update each other with the latest results of Rod, Oval or Trent Bridge. I have never seen anything similar before.
However, the question is, if The Million becomes a permanent fixture, how can we use it to give advantages to games we all love? The answer is simple. Milk as much as you can and use the money generated to protect the rest of the game. The European Central Bank must be willing to give up their children and open up private ownership of hundreds of franchises. The money generated from this transaction must, I cannot emphasize enough, that it must be evenly distributed to all 18 counties, otherwise the three-zone system will not work at all and many counties may go bankrupt.
As The Million continues to grow and is expected to become the world’s second largest franchise competition after IPL, all its revenue must flow directly to the counties. In this way, we can achieve the best of both worlds, a dazzling and exciting franchise competition that attracts new fans, and the county system protection that many of us cherish.
3 Reforming the European Central Bank
To this end, we need to carry out a thorough and thorough reform of the European Central Bank. The current management organization is simply not suitable for its purpose. It is really disgusting that Tom Harrison and his fellow European Central Bank officials decided to give themselves £2 million in bonuses when the counties are struggling to make ends meet in the pandemic and England players are cutting salaries.
In short, British cricket will never work with its current leader at the helm. Those who focus on the interests of the game must replace them. How this can happen is another matter. Only the government can take over the game to forcibly remove Harrison and his colleagues from their positions, but if they don’t want to make political views, it’s hard for people to be confident that they will do better.
4 Make full use of the power of the media
Cricket needs to be visible to survive. In recent years, these 18 counties have taken the lead in this field, and all games have been broadcast live on YouTube. This is a big step forward for the game. A large amount of game streaming data shows that county-level cricket is still receiving public attention. For example, Somerset recorded 250,000 streaming broadcasts per game in the summer of 2021.
The European Central Bank needs to make full use of the power of the media. The early social media posts of The Million were daunting, like a glum teacher standing in front of a group of teenagers, trying to make the children “low their voices.” There are signs that as the game progresses, the situation has improved, and the addition of YouTube anchors and musicians to the live broadcast is making progress, but there is still a long way to go.
The running of the test match on the BBC website and the playing clips of the wickets are also important steps. Short films like this have become more and more ways for young people to watch sports events today, and if cricket is to attract the interest of the next generation, it must be at the forefront.
However, apart from social media clips, new fans must have something to graduate. This is my last point…
5 Let everyone play the game
Cricket has an image problem. In short, it is seen as a sport played by fashionable white boys. This has not always been the case. Of the 11 players who started the Ashes Series in 2005, the last England team that really caught the public’s imagination, 8 were educated in public schools. In 2020, there are only 2 teams in the second test with Pakistan. Of course, these numbers will be slightly biased by the scholarship players, but it still presents a frustrating picture.
Despite the commendable efforts of Chance to Shine and other organizations, cricket has also disappeared from many public schools. Not only is playing games beyond the abilities of many working-class families, but it is becoming increasingly impossible to watch them. The decision to sell the country’s live test cricket to Sky Sports in 2004 had such a profound impact on the game that there is no need to explain them again.
However, what people talk about much less is the cost of actually watching a cricket match. In 2002, when I participated in my first live international cricket match, in the stand at Compton, the ticket for the first day of God’s test of Sri Lanka was 20 pounds for adults and 6 for children under 16 GBP. Next summer, the test ticket for New Zealand at the same booth will cost £70 for adults and £20 for children under 16. That is an increase of 250% in 20 years. The most expensive ticket is now £160 and you can play for a day.
Cricket is now the exclusive domain of the rich and privileged. It is another playground where the working class is not invited. The recent crisis of racism in games also stems from this inaccessibility. The work of Ebony Rainford-Brent and others to bring the game to minority children in the inner city is incredible, but unfortunately it is needed.
Those who run our sport will create opportunities in the head, but lack the willingness to give up their privileged bubble and formulate policies so that everyone has the opportunity to enjoy cricket. Before this change, it will be difficult for this sport to have the public appeal of football or even rugby.
“Cricket for all” cannot be just a slogan on a T-shirt, it must be the core of the ECB policy, otherwise the game will become irrelevant to the public like polo or fox hunting.
So, this is my five-point plan to repair British cricket. Feel free to add your own suggestions in the comments. I can even send a copy to Tom Harrison. However, I will not hold my breath for an answer.
Billy Crawford

related
[ad_2]
Source link