INTZ Investor Alert: ROSEN, a world-renowned investment adviser, encourages Intrusion Inc. investors who have suffered heavy losses to lose more than $100,000 to ensure that they can obtain lawyers before the important deadline – INTZ

[ad_1]

why: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminded purchasers of Intrusion Inc. (NASDAQ:INTZ) Between January 13, 2021 and April 13, 2021 (both dates inclusive) June 15, 2021 Lead plaintiff deadline.

So: If you purchased Intrusion securities during class, you may be entitled to compensation without having to pay any ready-made fees or costs through contingency fee arrangements.

What to do next: To join the “intrusion” class action, go to http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-register-2082.html Or call Phillip Kim, Esq.Toll free 866-767-3653 or email pkim@rosenlegal.com or cases@rosenlegal.com Information about class actions. A class action lawsuit has been filed.If you want to be the lead plaintiff, you must move the court No later than June 15, 2021. The lead plaintiff is the representative party in guiding the litigation on behalf of other class members.

Why Rosen Law: We encourage investors to choose qualified lawyers with successful leadership experience. Often, the company issuing the notice does not have comparable experience or resources. Rosen Law Firm represents global investors and is mainly engaged in securities class actions and shareholder derivatives litigation. Rosen Law Firm has completed the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company. Rosen Law Firm was ranked first by ISS Securities Class Action Service in 2017 ISS class action cases. The firm has been in the top four each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars in earnings for investors. In 2019 alone, the company raised more than $438 million for investors. In 2020, the founding partner Laurence Rosen was named “the giant of the plaintiff’s lawyers” by law360. Many of the company’s lawyers have been accredited by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

Case details: According to the lawsuit, during the entire “class action” period, the defendant made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose the following: (1) Intrusion’s Shield product is only a repackage of the existing technology in the company’s product portfolio; ( 2) Shield lacks patents, certificates, and insurance that are essential for the sale of network security products; (3) Intrusion exaggerates the effectiveness of Shield’s so-called network attack prevention capabilities; (4) Due to the above reasons, Intrusion’s Shield is unlikely to produce considerable Income; (5) Due to the above reasons, the defendant’s positive statements about the company’s business, operations and prospects were materially misleading and/or lack reasonable basis. When the real details entered the market, the lawsuit claimed that investors suffered losses.

To join the “intrusion” class action, go to http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-register-2082.html Or call Phillip Kim, Esq.Toll free 866-767-3653 or email pkim@rosenlegal.com or cases@rosenlegal.com Information about class actions.

No courses are accredited. Until the course is certified, you will not be represented by a lawyer unless you retain a lawyer. You can choose the lawyer of your choice. You may also be absent and do nothing at this time. The ability of investors to share potential future earnings does not depend on acting as the main plaintiff.

Follow us on LinkedIn for updates: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, On Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm Or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.

Lawyer advertisement. The previous results cannot guarantee similar results.



[ad_2]

Source link