The Danish Parliament votes on laws dealing with asylum seekers outside Europe


Denmark is likely to be the first EU country to deal with asylum seekers outside Europe, and this government proposal has aroused the anger of human rights advocates.

The country’s parliament will vote on a law on Thursday that will allow Denmark to send asylum seekers to a third country, most likely in Africa, to evaluate their applications.

Early reading Bill Not only was it supported by the ruling center-left Social Democratic Party, but also by the center-right opposition.

But the UN High Commissioner for Refugees condemn This is a “terrible race to the bottom” that violates the principles of international asylum cooperation.

Under the leadership of the Minister of Immigration, Denmark has a reputation for adopting one of the EU’s toughest immigration positions Matthias Tesfaye, A Social Democrat, he himself is the son of an Ethiopian immigrant.

This country is the first in Europe to declare the area around Damascus, the capital of Syria, Safe for refugees return. The government has also taken severe domestic measures, including forcibly expelling immigrant communities, in an attempt to break the so-called slums in several Danish cities.

According to the latest proposal, asylum seekers arriving in Denmark will be transported to a third country, where their applications will be processed. If successful, asylum seekers will be allowed to stay in a third country, otherwise, the country will expel them.

“The current asylum system has failed. It is inefficient and unfair. Children, women and men drown in the Mediterranean or are abused along migration routes, while human traffickers earn wealth,” Tesfaye told Finance The Times, adding that “a key goal” is to reduce the number of “spontaneous” asylum seekers in Denmark.

Denmark is just the latest attempt by European countries to set up refugee camps in Africa.Tony Blair Tried In 2004, Tanzania was persuaded to process asylum applications but failed.

Some left-wing lawmakers criticized the government for failing to outline which third country it will use, saying they refused to give “full power.” But after Tesfaye and another Danish minister traveled to the capital Kigali in late April and signed a memorandum of understanding on asylum and immigration, attention was focused on Rwanda.

The agreement did not include anything about the processing of asylum applications, and Kigali made it clear that “acceptance of asylum seekers from Denmark” was not part of the agreement. But Amnesty International still warns that any attempt by Denmark to send asylum seekers to a third country is “not only unreasonable, but potentially illegal.”

Rwanda has a tradition of welcoming refugees, hosting approximately 130,000 refugees, mainly from neighboring Burundi and the Democratic Republic of Congo. Although earlier plans to relocate African migrants from Israel to Rwanda failed in 2018, the so-called Emergency Transit Mechanism Center (ETM) was established in Gasola the following year.

The move comes after the Rwandan government, the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees and the African Union signed an agreement to house refugees and asylum-seekers held in Libyan detention centers. More than 500 refugees-mainly from Sudan, Eritrea, Ethiopia and Somalia-have been sent from Libya to Rwanda.


Source link

Recommended For You

About the Author: News Center