[ad_1]
Is the tuna as fake as these Birkin bags? Chile, it may be!
According to reports, Subway may not provide real tuna sandwiches. A study published in The New York Times showed that laboratory tests did not find any “amplifiable tuna DNA” in Subway’s tuna sandwiches.
In a lawsuit against Subway, the company accused the company of imitating tuna by mixing ingredients. According to reports, the publication submitted “60-inch Subway tuna sandwiches” from several restaurants in Los Angeles.
Studies have shown that they cannot detect any tuna, nor can they determine the actual composition of the fish used to make the sandwich.
“There is no amplifiable tuna DNA in the sample, so we did not obtain amplification products from the DNA. Therefore, we cannot determine the species,” the report said.
According to a laboratory spokesperson, there seemed to be only two conclusions.
“[There are] Two conclusions. First, it has gone through such a heavy processing, no matter what we can take out, we can’t identify it,” the laboratory spokesperson explained. “Or we bought some tuna and there was nothing there. “
A tuna expert also apparently pointed out that protein is difficult to determine after being cooked.
In a statement to @Complex, Subway stated to a certain extent that these claims are unfounded. “The taste and quality of our tuna makes it one of Subway’s most popular products, and these unfounded accusations may harm the interests of our franchisees and small business owners who work tirelessly to maintain the race. Baiwei sets high standards for all its products, including tuna,”
Roommates, are you still eating these sandwiches?
[ad_2]
Source link
