[ad_1]
The Match 4 of the Commonwealth Games Women’s Cricket 2022 will see the clash between England Women and Sri Lanka Women at the Edgbaston, Birmingham on Saturday, 30 July 2022. Keep reading to find out the Commonwealth Games Women’s Cricket 2022 Match 4 ENG-W vs SL-W Match Prediction.
Here is our ENG-W vs SL-W Match Prediction
Case 1: If England Women bats first
First Innings score prediction: England Women will score 160-170
Result prediction: England Women will win the match by more than 40 runs
Case 2: If Sri Lanka Women bats first
First Innings score prediction: Sri Lanka Women will score 90-100
Result prediction: England Women will win the match by 8 wickets
England Women vs Sri Lanka Women head to head:
Let’s have a look at the head to head record for ENG-W vs SL-W prediction. Which will help us to understand who will win today’s Commonwealth Games Women’s Cricket 2022 Match 4 prediction or who has higher chances of winning between England Women vs Sri Lanka Women.
Squads of both teams
England Women Squad:
Heather Knight (c), Maia Bouchier, Katherine Brunt, Alice Capsey, Kate Cross, Freya Davies, Sophia Dunkley, Sophie Ecclestone, Sarah Glenn, Amy Jones, Freya Kemp, Nat Sciver, Bryony Smith, Issy Wong, Danni Wyatt.
Sri Lanka Women Squad:
Chamari Athapaththu (c), Hasini Perera, Harshitha Samarawickrama, Vishmi Gunaratne, Malsha Shehani, Nilakshi de Silva, Kavisha Dilhari, Ama Kanchana, Achini Kulasuriya, Inoka Ranaweera, Udeshika Prabodhani, Sugandika Kumari, Rashmi de Silva, Oshadi Ranasinghe, Anushka Sanjeewani
ENG-W vs SL-W head to head in T20I
ENG-W vs SL-W Total Matches: 10
England Women Won: 08
Sri Lanka WomenWon: 0
No Result: –
Tied: 0
Abounded: 2
Stay updated with all the cricketing action, follow Cricadium on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram
Disclaimer
Match Predictions are for entertainment purpose only. We don’t get involved in or promote betting or gambling. Also, We strongly discourage behaviours of participating in illegal activities related to cricket. Our experts try to be as correct as possible, but we do not guarantee 100% correctness.
[ad_2]
Source link