T20 Blast, 2022 Match 124 LAS vs WAS Match Prediction Who Will Win Today

[ad_1]

Match 124 of the T20 Blast, 2022 will see the clash between Lancashire and Warwickshire at Old Trafford, Manchester on Sunday, 3 July 2022. Keep reading to find out the T20 Blast, 2022 Match 124 LAS vs WAS Match Prediction.

Here is our T20 Blast, 2022 Lancashire vs Warwickshire Match 124 Prediction

Let’s find out who will win T20 Blast, 2022 Match 124 between Lancashire vs Warwickshire Today Match Prediction

Case 1: If Lancashire bats first

Result prediction: Warwickshire will win the match by 5 wickets

Case 2: If Warwickshire bats first

First Innings score prediction: Warwickshire will score 180-190

Result prediction: Warwickshire will win the match by 15-25 runs

LAS vs WAS Squad

Lancashire Squad:

Phil Salt, George Bell, Josh Bohannon, Keaton Jennings, Luke Wells, Rob Jones, Danny Lamb, George Balderson, Liam Livingstone, Jos Buttler, Jack Blatherwick, Jack Morley, James Anderson, Liam Hurt, Luke Wood, Matt Parkinson, Richard Gleeson , Tom Bailey, Tom Hartley, Tim David, Dane Vilas

Warwickshire Squad:

Adam Hose, Dom Sibley, Dan Mousley, Ed Pollock, Hanuma Vihari, Pieter Malan, Robert Yates, Sam Hain, Alex Thomson, Chris Woakes, Jacob Bethell, Matthew Lamb, Tim Bresnan, Will Rhodes (C), Michael Burgess (WK) , Craig Miles, Danny Briggs, Ethan Brookes, George Furrer, George Garrett, Henry Brookes, Jake Lintott, Liam Norwell, Manraj Johal, Oliver Hannon-Dalby, Olly Stone, Ryan Sidebottom

LAS vs WAS head to head

LAS vs WAS Total Matches: 19

Lancashire Won: 8

Warwickshire Won: 7

No Result: 1

Tied: 0

Abounded: 3

LAS vs WAS Today Match Prediction: Content

Stay updated with all the cricketing action, follow Cricadium on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram

Disclaimer

Match Predictions are for entertainment purpose only. We don’t get involved in or promote betting or gambling. Also, We strongly discourage behaviours of participating in illegal activities related to cricket. Our experts try to be as correct as possible, but we do not guarantee 100% correctness.



[ad_2]

Source link