[ad_1]
Wow. So where do we start? This is the hundredth time I reiterate that Chris Silverwood (he is the most powerful head coach in England since Ray Illingworth) seems to be beyond his depth, or am I just blaming the European Central Bank for giving him one Clumsy hands? This is a toss.
However, this time, I think I will focus on the former. Although no one can turn pig ears into silk wallets, the best managers can also turn substandard materials into obscure and feasible things. It takes special incompetence to turn feces into something worse.
Speaking of worse, England’s selection strategy in the first two tests of this series is absolutely incredible. Yes, when your batting lineup is as useful as a condom with holes, you will usually enter the stagnant pool without a blade, but England’s reckless strategy will only make things worse.
So let’s review what happened. I have to repeat this to myself because I still don’t believe it happened…
The England team left out their most prolific two seam teams ever on the greens in Brisbane in order to allow them to get a flatter course on the Adelaide course, which made them somewhat toothless.
At the same time, they picked their fastest bowler in Gabba, where accuracy and batting ability got the most rewards, so it became more difficult to include him in Adelaide, where his Speed was originally a much-needed point of difference on a better hitting surface.
Oh, and to exacerbate their mistakes, England’s management decided not to consider their professional spinner-this is their only other difference-once they thought it would be too risky to choose the aforementioned pacemaker in back-to-back matches (or even However, in fact, he has been resting for a week).
All this is enough to make any rational cricket supporter a headache. This is crazy. We have now entered the crucial Adelaide test. The attack consisted of five right-arm mid-speed sealers, two of which were uncooked. Are there any accidents in Australia on the run?
Call me a purist, but I actually think that England’s 5-seamer strategy is a crime against cricket. This is stupid, contrary to everything that the history of the game tells us, I can’t believe that a coach who has risen from a professional team (albeit too fast) would think this is acceptable-this, of course not.
More importantly, let us not forget that this is the fourth or fifth time that Chris Silverwood has selected 5 unchanging sealing machines. In my book, doing it only once is a dismissal crime.
Jack Ritchie has his critics-many of them forget that he scored 12 wickets and defeated Nathan Lyon at the age of 25 in the last ashes-but he was in the cloth What opportunity does Brisbane have? The spinner’s main job was to get a wicket in the second game, but England’s poor batting prevented him from getting this opportunity. More importantly, it is easy to target the spinner in the first game without the pressure of the scoreboard. Australian batsmen can attack Rich, because they know there will be no consequences if they go out. They are still far ahead in the game. This is a gamble that they cannot lose.
So, how did Chris Silverwood, who has been involved in professional competitions for 20 years, convince himself that the empty selection strategy in the first two tests is appropriate? I can only assume that this is because he is completely focused on playing under the lights. In other words, he was so fascinated by what could happen in Adelaide when night fell, that he forgot that England would spend five hours on the court before the lights actually came on. What’s more, he completely forgot that the first test is also very important. Therefore, keeping the two leading ticket collectors in England fresh at the end of the first day of the second test, especially for the one-hour game, may not be the best strategy.
People also want to know, has the management of England considered that this particular Adelaide test was nearly a month later than the usual game? So it will be lighter and longer. Shane Warne (in the comments) claimed that the light during the day is about an hour longer than the usual duration in these day and night fixtures. So how long did this allow Anderson and Broad to reverse the momentum of the entire series? Buggar is the answer.
The absurd status of the England team became more apparent because after waiting for a few days for the opportunity to meet the Australian batsmen under the lights, Root ended up throwing a few bowling balls in the shadows to speed up the second new ball. You can’t make up these things.
And, of course, none of the above challenges England’s basic assumption that Adelaide is their best chance to win the test. The England team lost every day and night game they played away. On the other hand, Australia remained unbeaten in Adelaide’s pink ball game. So, what makes Silverwood use this particular device as his team’s best chance of success?
It must be emphasized that cricket is an interesting old game. Something strange happened. It is not unheard of for confident bloggers to write something (or someone) and then have to eat humble pie when they become geniuses. But can you really see this happening?
I feel that we have all seen this special movie before. It involves Australia with a score between 450 and 650. Then England’s score between 300 and 200 was quickly eliminated.
And that, my close friend of blood, will be Ashes as the end of the game. No team returned from two tests to win the urn. And this team is the worst equipped team in history and can break that particular ominous thing.
So if England were defeated as predicted, would I be sad? Of course I will. However, I have to admit that my part will be numb to this. After all, if you were to choose five right-arm mid-speed seaming machines for the test game below, and put a Kookaburra ball on a flat deck, then you damn it deserves everything.
James Morgan
related
[ad_2]
Source link
