[ad_1]
For a long time, there has been controversy about the different compensations that student athletes can get when they play under the NCAA. However, on Monday, the Supreme Court ruled that the NCAA cannot restrict the educational benefits available to student athletes.
according to NBC News, The Supreme Court ruled that NCAA violated antitrust laws in relation to the amount that student athletes can obtain in certain benefits (such as paid internships, computers, tutoring, educational equipment, etc.)
Judge Brett Kavanaugh stated, “The NCAA and its member academies are driving down the salaries of student athletes who collectively generate billions of dollars in revenue for the university each year. In addition to student athletes, these huge amounts It seems to flow to everyone.”
He went on to talk about the NCAA argument that the popularity of college sports is the result of fans knowing that athletes are not paid.
Judge Brett Kavanaugh continued: “The NCAA business model is completely illegal in almost all other industries in the United States. No restaurants in a region can cut chefs’ wages based on the theory that “customers prefer to eat food from low-paid chefs”.
Although the ruling did involve education-related benefits, it did not rule on the ongoing debate that college athletes should be paid for using their names and images. However, the NCAA stated that they will consider whether to compensate the student athlete’s name and image this month.
As prior to According to reports, as early as 2019, the NCAA voted unanimously in favor of allowing college athletes to profit from their names, images and portraits, but stated that they must “do this in a manner consistent with the university model.”
Want to update directly in your text inbox?Contact us at 917-722-8057 or Click here to join!
TSR Staff: Jade Ashley @Jade_Ashley94
[ad_2]
Source link
