[ad_1]
In my favorite novel, Red and black, The color indicates the only way for a Frenchman of low origin to ascend. After all, it is not the red robe of the military uniform, nor the black robe of the church, but the white linen of the boudoir, which can even promote our fool hero. The wife of a mayor and the daughter of a marquis brought him to the position he dreamed of. The nominal “red”, I still think, is a cunning joke: not the color of war, but the color of sex, upstart old friends.
Or at least a former friend. In the past two centuries, more professional courses have been opened than can be named colors. At the same time, they shut down the old-fashioned excessive romance. For the intermarriage of educated people, “mixed mating” is an appropriate cold phrase, and they combine their material and cognitive advantages in the process.
In the middle of the last century, the following observations made me curious. I hardly know a heterosexual person of the same age with a degree, he has a person without a spouse. Among couples with a much higher income on one side, the other often brings cultural influence, big relatives, convenient passports or similar balancers. (It seems that there is not enough strategic value to close the gap.) As for the bachelor’s degree, out of approximately one hundred people who are most active on the day each year, approximately 90 are graduates of research universities. An evening spent with alumni from art or drama school.
There is a view that only female graduates are unwilling to marry under their academic qualifications. I believe this will cause confusion in causality. When men of higher status often marry wives with lower education levels, this does not reflect preference, necessarily, but the demand for alternatives. Once the opportunity to enter the university and the workplace spreads to women, both sexes are free to become snobs. Since then, how extravagant we have used the license. In recent years, almost all the habits of urban liberals have disturbed my conscience. Its romantic isolation is an exception. Even private education cannot create a humble caste.
That’s why, along with its ruthless erudition, I’ve always been Nobility of talentIn his new book, Adrian Wooldridge tries to save the elite from the rigid upper class foreseen by Aldous Huxley. Like all the best argumentative non-fiction works, it failed in the policy restoration phase. There is no doubt that ideas such as “upgrading vocational education” can improve life opportunities. The tax law can reduce the hustle and bustle of inheriting wealth more than it. But soon, a serious elite came across the untouchable boundaries of the personal realm. Parents are full of enthusiasm for their children’s life, and this enthusiasm is also antisocial to nature. The most skilled of these self-traffickers will be graduate double-teaming. For such an intimate choice as marriage, society should not “do” anything. Calculating the cost is only the responsibility of society.
And these go far beyond the chaos of social mobility. The salient point of the modern Alpha couple is not to promote their own interests, but to be plain. Bigamy reappears in the drama-Balzac, the kitchen sink movie, Cinderella — Because when someone at UBS marries someone in Freshfields, it has a charm.
The so-called subversive nature of cross-class sexual behavior is not the point (after all, there are many such things). It is the contact and final synthesis of two completely different life experiences. Any child born from this, as long as they absorb every bit, they will become more rounded and imaginative. The ruling class of heterosexual mating may be the most disciplined, competitive, and effective ruling class known to the West, but it is also the least original. Wooldridge could not have been better when he described the distance between their bohemian self-image and the monoculture of their private lives.
Email Janan at janan.ganesh@ft.com
follow @FTLifeArts Get to know our latest story first on Twitter
[ad_2]
Source link
